Skip to content

ITDB vs ITDG

iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

ITDBANYSE Arca

iShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF

ITDGBNYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

ITDB −0.03pt a year

ITDB0.09%ITDG0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

ITDB 1.7×the volume

ITDB15.7KITDG9.11K

3Y return · a year

ITDG +7.5pt

ITDB+14.3%ITDG+21.8%

ITDB vs ITDG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.6%ITDB+12.3%ITDG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ITDB +6.6%. ITDG +12.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ITDB 0.09%, better
ITDG 0.12%
Fund size
ITDB $83M
ITDG $68M
1Y total return
ITDB +6.6%
ITDG +12.3%, better
Yield (12M)
ITDB 1.94%, better
ITDG 1.45%
Holdings
ITDB 29196
ITDG 11928
Avg volume (30D)
ITDB 15.7K sh, better
ITDG 9.11K sh
NAV per share
ITDB $34.81
ITDG $41.80
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ITDB: Cost 89, Risk 67, Mission 100, Tradability 55, Holdings 73, Durability 65. ITDG: Cost 46, Risk 38, Mission 100, Tradability 58, Holdings 74, Durability 58.
Pillar letters and Scores for ITDB, ITDG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarITDBITDG
Cost30% weightA89HigherC46
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightB67HigherD38
Tradability15% weightB55B58Higher
Holdings10% weightA73A74Higher
Durability5% weightB65HigherB58

Rank among Target Date funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ITDB and ITDG are both graded against the same 9 Target Date funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Target Date⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

ITDB ranks 2nd and ITDG 4th of 9 funds in the Target Date Category.

  1. Rank 1AITDCiShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2AITDBiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3BITDDiShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BITDEiShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 4BITDGiShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 6BITDHiShares LifePath Target Date 2060 ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ITDBAiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

ITDGBiShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF

In short

ITDB The 401(k) staple, unbundled. One ticker holds a global basket of iShares funds and walks down a preset glide path toward 2030, from the suite that first brought target-date investing out of workplace plans and onto an exchange.

ITDG A whole retirement glide path in one ticker. ITDG holds a bundle of iShares stock and bond ETFs aimed at a 2055 retirement date and gets more conservative as that date approaches, no 401(k) menu required.

Stated mandate

ITDB The Fund seeks retirement outcomes through a broad portfolio of ETFs. It reallocates among underlying funds using a predetermined glide path that becomes more conservative as the target date approaches.

ITDG The fund is designed as a diversified portfolio of stock and bond ETFs for investors expecting to retire or begin withdrawals around 2055. Its allocation is intended to become more conservative as the target date approaches.

Why people hold it

  • ITDB 0.09% a year, below the median for target-date ETFs, for a whole diversified portfolio you never rebalance by hand.
  • One decision, not twelve: a global mix of underlying iShares ETFs that reallocates on a predetermined glide path, growing more conservative as 2030 approaches.
  • Launched October 2023 in the first US suite of target-date ETFs, so the format lives in a brokerage account instead of only inside an employer plan.yahoo.com
  • ITDG One trade buys a diversified stock-and-bond portfolio built around a 2055 retirement, and the mix is designed to turn more conservative as that date nears.ishares.com
  • 0.12% a year for a managed glide path, matching the other long-dated LifePath rungs (ITDH, ITDI, ITDJ all charge the same).
  • What it holds lines up with what the prospectus says it does: a fund of iShares index ETFs on a published glide path, not a black box.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • ITDB Thinly traded with a modest asset base next to headline index ETFs, so spreads can be wider and order type matters more.
  • No outside benchmark to grade it against. BlackRock sets the glide path, so the stock/bond mix reflects its own house view.
  • At the target date the fund is designed to transition into the iShares LifePath Retirement ETF, so holding past 2030 means holding a different vehicle.yahoo.com
  • ITDG With 2055 decades out, the mix leans heavily toward stocks by design, so it moves with equity markets. The de-risking happens later, not now.
  • Thinly traded next to mainstream index ETFs, so bid-ask spreads can be wider than the headline fee suggests.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year rather than quarterly or monthly, so it is not built as an income drip.

Full ITDB profile⁠

Full ITDG profile⁠

ITDB vs ITDG Holdings

How ITDB and ITDG differ

Overlap by weight is not available for these funds.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile84.9%
  • Sector11 Sectors95.9%

Sector

Sector weights in ITDB and ITDG, widest gap first
SectorMore in ITDBMore in ITDG
TechnologyITDG +1.9 points
Real EstateITDB +1.6 points
UtilitiesITDB +1.4 points
FinancialsITDG +0.9 points
EnergyITDB +0.8 points
CommunicationITDG +0.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryITDG +0.4 points
Consumer StaplesITDB +0.2 points
MaterialsITDG +0.1 points
Health CareITDG +0.2 points
IndustrialsITDB +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ITDB and ITDG, widest gap first
CountryMore in ITDBMore in ITDG
United StatesITDB +15.1 points
JapanITDG +2.9 points
TaiwanITDG +1.9 points
IndiaITDG +1.5 points
NetherlandsITDG +1.3 points
South KoreaITDG +1.3 points
United KingdomITDG +1.2 points
CanadaITDG +1.2 points
Other countries (5)ITDG +3.9 points

Outside the US: ITDG 68% developed, 32% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ITDB11.4%
  • ITDG20.3%

Asset class

ITDB
Multi-Asset
ITDG
Multi-Asset

Holdings

Top 10 Holdings

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingITDBITDG
AAPLApple2.23%4.08%
NVDANVIDIA2.20%3.90%
MSFTMicrosoft1.74%3.17%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc1.04%1.91%
Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing0.76%1.52%
GOOGLAlphabet Class A0.73%1.33%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.71%1.24%
METAMeta Platforms Class A0.61%1.11%
GOOGAlphabet Class C0.59%1.08%
TSLATesla Inc0.52%0.96%

All ITDB holdings⁠All ITDG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ITDB vs ITDG Cost

Overpaying ITDG vs ITDB

$622

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ITDB 0.09%

    $1,898

  • ITDG 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ITDB 0.09%
  • ITDG 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K051015202530ITDG $2,520ITDB $1,898

Year by year

YearITDBITDGOverpaying
10$165$220$55
20$646$859$213
30$1,898$2,520$622

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%ITDB, cheaper
  • 0.12%ITDG
  • Middle half of Target Date funds
  • Median 0.11%

ITDB cheapest of 9 funds

ITDG 6th cheapest of 9 funds

ITDB vs ITDG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ITDB 1.94%, better
ITDG 1.45%
Payout (12M)
ITDB $0.67
ITDG $0.60
Last payment
ITDB $0.67
ITDG $0.60
Ex-dividend
ITDB Dec 23, 2025
ITDG Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
ITDB Dec 29, 2025
ITDG Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
ITDB Annual
ITDG Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ITDBAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.17; Dec 20, 2024 $0.58; Dec 23, 2025 $0.67. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ITDGAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.23; Dec 20, 2024 $0.45; Dec 23, 2025 $0.60. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ITDB vs ITDG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ITDB 7.9%, betterITDG 11.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ITDB 1.18ITDG 1.40, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ITDB −8.4%since Oct 2023ITDG −16.6%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ITDB 0.59ITDG 0.91

Popular comparisons

  • ITDBAvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDGBvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDBAvsITDDB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDGBvsITDDB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDBAvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITDGBvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.