Skip to content
etf.net

ITDB vs ITDD

iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

ITDBANYSE Arca

iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

ITDDBNYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

ITDB −0.02pt a year

ITDB0.09%ITDD0.11%

Avg volume · 30D

ITDD 1.2×the volume

ITDB15.7KITDD18.5K

3Y return · a year

ITDD +3.7pt

ITDB+14.3%ITDD+18.0%

ITDB vs ITDD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.6%ITDB+9.5%ITDD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ITDB +6.6%. ITDD +9.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ITDB 0.09%, better
ITDD 0.11%
Fund size
ITDB $83M
ITDD $124M
1Y total return
ITDB +6.6%
ITDD +9.5%, better
Yield (12M)
ITDB 1.94%, better
ITDD 1.68%
Holdings
ITDB 29196
ITDD 29140
Avg volume (30D)
ITDB 15.7K sh
ITDD 18.5K sh, better
NAV per share
ITDB $34.81
ITDD $38.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ITDB: Cost 89, Risk 67, Mission 100, Tradability 55, Holdings 73, Durability 65. ITDD: Cost 46, Risk 62, Mission 100, Tradability 75, Holdings 64, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for ITDB, ITDD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarITDBITDD
Cost30% weightA89HigherC46
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightB67HigherB62
Tradability15% weightB55A75Higher
Holdings10% weightA73HigherB64
Durability5% weightB65A75Higher

Rank among Target Date funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ITDB and ITDD are both graded against the same 9 Target Date funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Target Date⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

ITDB ranks 2nd and ITDD 3rd of 9 funds in the Target Date Category.

  1. Rank 1AITDCiShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETFScore 83
  2. Rank 2AITDBiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3BITDDiShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BITDEiShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ITDBAiShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF

ITDDBiShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF

In short

ITDB The 401(k) staple, unbundled. One ticker holds a global basket of iShares funds and walks down a preset glide path toward 2030, from the suite that first brought target-date investing out of workplace plans and onto an exchange.

ITDD A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: a global mix of stock and bond ETFs that drifts toward bonds as 2040 gets closer. The 401(k) staple, unbundled into something any brokerage account can buy for 0.11% a year.

Stated mandate

ITDB The Fund seeks retirement outcomes through a broad portfolio of ETFs. It reallocates among underlying funds using a predetermined glide path that becomes more conservative as the target date approaches.

ITDD The fund seeks to provide a diversified mix of stock and bond ETFs for investors expecting to retire or begin withdrawals around 2040. Its allocation becomes more conservative as the target date approaches.

Why people hold it

  • ITDB 0.09% a year, below the median for target-date ETFs, for a whole diversified portfolio you never rebalance by hand.
  • One decision, not twelve: a global mix of underlying iShares ETFs that reallocates on a predetermined glide path, growing more conservative as 2030 approaches.
  • Launched October 2023 in the first US suite of target-date ETFs, so the format lives in a brokerage account instead of only inside an employer plan.yahoo.com
  • ITDD One trade buys a diversified global mix of stock and bond ETFs that grows more conservative as the 2040 target date nears. No rebalancing homework on your end.ishares.com
  • Costs 0.11% a year, in line with the typical target-date ETF and cheap for a fund that handles the whole asset mix.
  • Ordinary 1940 Act fund in an ETF wrapper, so the glide-path approach long locked inside employer plan menus trades like any other ticker.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • ITDB Thinly traded with a modest asset base next to headline index ETFs, so spreads can be wider and order type matters more.
  • No outside benchmark to grade it against. BlackRock sets the glide path, so the stock/bond mix reflects its own house view.
  • At the target date the fund is designed to transition into the iShares LifePath Retirement ETF, so holding past 2030 means holding a different vehicle.yahoo.com
  • ITDD The glide path is the manager's design. The stock-to-bond shift runs on their schedule and their assumptions, not on your own read of markets or retirement timing.ishares.com
  • Launched in 2023 and trades lightly next to core index ETFs, so spreads can be wider than headline funds. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • In our target-date group it sits in the bottom quartile, behind LifePath siblings a few rungs up and down the ladder such as ITDC and ITDE.

Full ITDB profile⁠

Full ITDD profile⁠

ITDB vs ITDD Holdings

How ITDB and ITDD differ

Overlap by weight is not available for these funds.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile92.5%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.0%

Sector

Sector weights in ITDB and ITDD, widest gap first
SectorMore in ITDBMore in ITDD
Real EstateITDD +0.6 points
TechnologyITDD +0.6 points
EnergyITDB +0.5 points
Consumer StaplesITDB +0.4 points
Health CareITDB +0.4 points
CommunicationITDD +0.4 points
IndustrialsITDD +0.4 points
UtilitiesITDB +0.3 points
FinancialsITDB +0.1 points
MaterialsITDB +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionaryITDB +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ITDB and ITDD, widest gap first
CountryMore in ITDBMore in ITDD
United StatesITDB +7.5 points
JapanITDD +1.4 points
IndiaITDD +1.1 points
TaiwanITDD +0.9 points
CanadaITDD +0.7 points
United KingdomITDD +0.6 points
South KoreaITDD +0.6 points
ChinaITDD +0.6 points
Other countries (4)ITDD +1.7 points

Outside the US: ITDD 69% developed, 31% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ITDB11.4%
  • ITDD15.4%

Asset class

ITDB
Multi-Asset
ITDD
Multi-Asset

Holdings

Top 10 Holdings

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingITDBITDD
AAPLApple2.23%3.10%
NVDANVIDIA2.20%2.97%
MSFTMicrosoft1.74%2.41%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc1.04%1.45%
Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing0.76%1.11%
GOOGLAlphabet Class A0.73%1.02%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.71%0.94%
METAMeta Platforms Class A0.61%0.84%
GOOGAlphabet Class C0.59%0.82%
TSLATesla Inc0.52%0.73%

All ITDB holdings⁠All ITDD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ITDB vs ITDD Cost

Overpaying ITDD vs ITDB

$415

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ITDB 0.09%

    $1,898

  • ITDD 0.11%

    $2,313

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ITDB 0.09%
  • ITDD 0.11%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K$2.5K051015202530ITDD $2,313ITDB $1,898

Year by year

YearITDBITDDOverpaying
10$165$201$36
20$646$788$142
30$1,898$2,313$415

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%ITDB, cheaper
  • 0.11%ITDD
  • Middle half of Target Date funds
  • Median 0.11%

ITDB cheapest of 9 funds

ITDD 3rd cheapest of 9 funds

ITDB vs ITDD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ITDB 1.94%, better
ITDD 1.68%
Payout (12M)
ITDB $0.67
ITDD $0.64
Last payment
ITDB $0.67
ITDD $0.64
Ex-dividend
ITDB Dec 23, 2025
ITDD Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
ITDB Dec 29, 2025
ITDD Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
ITDB Annual
ITDD Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ITDBAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.17; Dec 20, 2024 $0.58; Dec 23, 2025 $0.67. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ITDDAnnual · 3 paymentsAll ITDD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.24; Dec 20, 2024 $0.48; Dec 23, 2025 $0.64. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

ITDB vs ITDD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ITDB 7.9%, betterITDD 9.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ITDB 1.18ITDD 1.30, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ITDB −8.4%since Oct 2023ITDD −12.5%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ITDB 0.59ITDD 0.75

Popular comparisons

  • ITDBAvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDDBvsITDCA

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDBAvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDDBvsITDEB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2045 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDBAvsITDGB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2030 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ITDDBvsITDGB

    iShares LifePath Target Date 2040 ETF · iShares LifePath Target Date 2055 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.11% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.