ITM ranks 2nd and MMCA 14th of 19 funds in the Intermediate Municipal Bonds Category.
ITM vs MMCA
ITM −0.18pt a year
0.18%0.36%
ITM 12.6×the volume
648K51.4K
ITM +0.1pt
+4.7%+4.6%
ITM vs MMCA Performance
+0.1%+0.1%
- ITM 0.18%, better
- MMCA 0.36%
- ITM $2.33B
- MMCA $85M
- ITM +0.1%
- MMCA +0.1%
- ITM 3.08%
- MMCA 3.61%, better
- ITM 1418
- MMCA 119
- ITM 648K sh, better
- MMCA 51.4K sh
- ITM $45.60
- MMCA $21.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ITM | MMCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | F24 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A97 |
| Risk | D39 | C45Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D26 |
| Durability | A91Higher | D37 |
Rank among Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. ITM and MMCA are both graded against the same 19 Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ITMA
MMCAC
In short
ITM Most big muni ETFs buy the whole curve. ITM, running since 2007, sticks to the middle: a passive, AMT-free national index of roughly 1,400 bonds, paid out monthly, for 0.18% a year.
MMCA California's own corner of the muni market, picked by hand: MacKay's muni team runs roughly 120 intermediate bonds chasing income exempt from both federal and California tax. Active, not an index, and it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
ITM The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the ICE Intermediate AMT-Free Broad National Municipal Index before fees and expenses.
MMCA The Fund seeks current income that is exempt from both federal and California income taxes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ITM vs MMCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ITM vs MMCA Cost
Overpaying MMCA vs ITM
$3,571
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ITM 0.18%
$3,749
MMCA 0.36%
$7,320
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ITM | MMCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $652 | $324 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,522 | $1,241 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $7,320 | $3,571 |
- 0.18%ITM, cheaper
- 0.36%MMCA
- Middle half of Intermediate Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.30%
ITM 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
MMCA 17th cheapest of 19 funds
ITM vs MMCA Dividends
- ITM 3.08%
- MMCA 3.61%, better
- ITM $1.41
- MMCA $0.76
- ITM $0.11
- MMCA $0.06
- ITM Oct 1, 2026
- MMCA Oct 30, 2026
- ITM Oct 6, 2026
- MMCA Pays Nov 3, 2026
- ITM Monthly
- MMCA Monthly
Distribution history
ITM vs MMCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ITM 6.2%MMCA 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ITM 0.05, betterMMCA 0.03
- Worst fall
- ITM −14.4%MMCA −16.0%
- Market sensitivity
- ITM 0.97MMCA 0.80
ITM and MMCA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
