QTUM ranks 1st and IVES 16th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
IVES vs QTUM
QTUM −0.35pt a year
0.75%0.40%
IVES 1.2×the volume
431K362K
IVES vs QTUM Performance
+7.7%+17.5%
- IVES 0.75%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- IVES $854M
- QTUM $5.06B
- IVES +7.7%
- QTUM +17.5%, better
- IVES
- QTUM 1.05%
- IVES 31
- QTUM 89
- IVES 431K sh, better
- QTUM 362K sh
- IVES $37.17
- QTUM $134.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVES | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | C54 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | A85Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | B55 | A91Higher |
| Durability | B58 | A79Higher |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. IVES and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVESC
QTUMA
In short
IVES Wedbush turned its own AI research call into a ticker. IVES tracks a house-built index of roughly 30 AI names, reaching past US megacaps into chip-supply-chain countries like Taiwan, the Netherlands and Israel.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
IVES The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVES vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVES vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying IVES vs QTUM
$6,392
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVES 0.75%
$14,482
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVES | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $723 | $613 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $2,793 | $2,285 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $8,090 | $6,392 |
- 0.75%IVES
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
IVES 22nd cheapest of 30 funds
IVES vs QTUM Dividends
- IVES
- QTUM 1.05%
- IVES
- QTUM $1.40
- IVES $0.13
- QTUM $0.46
- IVES Dec 22, 2025
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- IVES Dec 29, 2025
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- IVES Irregular
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
IVES vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVES 32.2%QTUM 28.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVES 0.77QTUM 1.30
- Worst fall
- IVES −22.6%QTUM −38.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IVES 2.12QTUM 1.67
IVES and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




