IVV ranks 2nd of 14 funds in the S&P 500 Category.
IVV vs SCHG
IVV −0.01pt a year
0.03%0.04%
SCHG 1.2×the volume
6.39M7.51M
SCHG +3.2pt
+15.7%+18.9%
IVV vs SCHG Performance
+80.7%+81.9%
- IVV 0.03%, better
- SCHG 0.04%
- IVV $889B
- SCHG $64B
- IVV +13.7%, better
- SCHG +6.8%
- IVV 1.08%, better
- SCHG 0.39%
- IVV 507
- SCHG 187
- IVV 6.39M sh
- SCHG 7.51M sh, better
- IVV $775.30
- SCHG $35.61
ETF.net Grade
No winner tick: these funds sit in different Categories, and each Score ranks a fund only inside its own Category.
| Pillar | IVV | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84 | A96 |
| Mission | A100 | A92 |
| Risk | C51 | C43 |
| Tradability | A80 | A87 |
| Holdings | B55 | D36 |
| Durability | A86 | A75 |
Where each fund ranks
Different Categories. Their Grades do not compare head to head.
SCHG ranks 2nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
Our read on each fund
IVVA
SCHGA
In short
IVV The 2000-vintage iShares take on the S&P 500, now a $100B-plus cornerstone holding: roughly 500 large US companies, 0.03% a year, and tracking that stays tight to the index.
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
Stated mandate
IVV The fund seeks to track the investment results of an index made up of large-capitalization U.S. equities.
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVV vs SCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVV vs SCHG Cost
Overpaying SCHG vs IVV
$211
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVV 0.03%
$638
SCHG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVV | SCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $73 | $18 |
| 20 | $216 | $288 | $72 |
| 30 | $638 | $849 | $211 |
- 0.03%IVV, cheaper
- 0.04%SCHG
Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.Different Categories, so each fee sits in its own Category’s range.
IVV among 14 S&P 500 funds
- Middle half of S&P 500 funds
- Median 0.09%
IVV 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
SCHG among 35 US Growth Index funds
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IVV vs SCHG Dividends
- IVV 1.08%, better
- SCHG 0.39%
- IVV $8.40
- SCHG $0.14
- IVV $2.20
- SCHG $0.04
- IVV Sep 15, 2026
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- IVV Sep 18, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- IVV Quarterly
- SCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
IVV vs SCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IVV
- SCHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVV 12.4%, betterSCHG 16.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVV 1.37, betterSCHG 1.25
- Worst fall
- IVV −24.5%, betterSCHG −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IVV 1.00SCHG 1.20
IVV and SCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.02%
- Different Categories. Each fund is graded against different funds, so their Grades do not compare head to head.




