SPYG ranks 1st and IWP 16th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IWP vs SPYG
SPYG −0.19pt a year
0.23%0.04%
SPYG 2.9×the volume
778K2.28M
SPYG +5.9pt
+11.6%+17.5%
IWP vs SPYG Performance
+12.4%+73.4%
- IWP 0.23%
- SPYG 0.04%, better
- IWP $18.5B
- SPYG $55.5B
- IWP −7.0%
- SPYG +8.3%, better
- IWP 0.40%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- IWP 275
- SPYG 154
- IWP 778K sh
- SPYG 2.28M sh, better
- IWP $131.67
- SPYG $119.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWP | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A96 | A98Higher |
| Risk | D33 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A76 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | D38 |
| Durability | B69 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IWP and SPYG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWPB
SPYGA
In short
IWP Mid-cap growth, undiluted: about 300 US companies too big to be startups, too small to be mega-caps, screened by Russell for growth traits. Trading since 2001, which makes it one of the elders of the style.
SPYG The growth half of the S&P 500 for 0.04% a year, running since 2000. No exotic screen, no reinvention: just the index's fastest-growing names, in the cheapest wrapper tracking that index.
Stated mandate
IWP The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. mid-cap stocks selected for growth characteristics, including measures such as growth forecasts and sales growth.
SPYG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It provides exposure to S&P 500 companies selected for strong growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWP vs SPYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWP vs SPYG Cost
Overpaying IWP vs SPYG
$3,910
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWP 0.23%
$4,759
SPYG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWP | SPYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $73 | $346 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $288 | $1,342 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $849 | $3,910 |
- 0.23%IWP
- 0.04%SPYG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SPYG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IWP 22nd cheapest of 35 funds
IWP vs SPYG Dividends
- IWP 0.40%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- IWP $0.53
- SPYG $0.59
- IWP $0.15
- SPYG $0.15
- IWP Sep 15, 2026
- SPYG Sep 21, 2026
- IWP Sep 18, 2026
- SPYG Sep 23, 2026
- IWP Quarterly
- SPYG Quarterly
Distribution history
IWP vs SPYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWP
- SPYG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWP 17.8%SPYG 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IWP 0.65SPYG 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- IWP −38.6%SPYG −32.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IWP 1.13SPYG 1.17
IWP and SPYG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


