SCHG ranks 2nd and IWP 16th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IWP vs SCHG
SCHG −0.19pt a year
0.23%0.04%
SCHG 9.8×the volume
778K7.59M
SCHG +6.9pt
+11.6%+18.5%
IWP vs SCHG Performance
+12.4%+74.3%
- IWP 0.23%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- IWP $18.5B
- SCHG $61.7B
- IWP −7.0%
- SCHG +3.3%, better
- IWP 0.40%
- SCHG 0.40%
- IWP 275
- SCHG 187
- IWP 778K sh
- SCHG 7.59M sh, better
- IWP $131.67
- SCHG $34.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWP | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A92 |
| Risk | D33 | C41Higher |
| Tradability | A76 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B69 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IWP and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWPB
SCHGA
In short
IWP Mid-cap growth, undiluted: about 300 US companies too big to be startups, too small to be mega-caps, screened by Russell for growth traits. Trading since 2001, which makes it one of the elders of the style.
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
Stated mandate
IWP The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. mid-cap stocks selected for growth characteristics, including measures such as growth forecasts and sales growth.
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWP vs SCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWP vs SCHG Cost
Overpaying IWP vs SCHG
$3,910
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWP 0.23%
$4,759
SCHG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWP | SCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $73 | $346 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $288 | $1,342 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $849 | $3,910 |
- 0.23%IWP
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IWP 22nd cheapest of 35 funds
IWP vs SCHG Dividends
- IWP 0.40%
- SCHG 0.40%
- IWP $0.53
- SCHG $0.14
- IWP $0.15
- SCHG $0.04
- IWP Sep 15, 2026
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- IWP Sep 18, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- IWP Quarterly
- SCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
IWP vs SCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWP
- SCHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWP 17.8%SCHG 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IWP 0.65SCHG 1.16, better
- Worst fall
- IWP −38.6%SCHG −34.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IWP 1.13SCHG 1.20
IWP and SCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


