IMCG ranks 2nd and IWP 16th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs IWP
IMCG −0.17pt a year
0.06%0.23%
IWP 5.9×the volume
132K778K
IMCG +2.7pt
+14.3%+11.6%
IMCG vs IWP Performance
+30.8%+12.4%
- IMCG 0.06%, better
- IWP 0.23%
- IMCG $4.04B
- IWP $18.5B
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- IWP −7.0%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- IWP 0.40%
- IMCG 262
- IWP 275
- IMCG 132K sh
- IWP 778K sh, better
- IMCG $93.24
- IWP $131.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | IWP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A95 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | B61 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | A71 |
| Durability | B66 | B69Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and IWP are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
IWPB
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
IWP Mid-cap growth, undiluted: about 300 US companies too big to be startups, too small to be mega-caps, screened by Russell for growth traits. Trading since 2001, which makes it one of the elders of the style.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
IWP The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. mid-cap stocks selected for growth characteristics, including measures such as growth forecasts and sales growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs IWP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs IWP Cost
Overpaying IWP vs IMCG
$3,489
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
IWP 0.23%
$4,759
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | IWP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $419 | $309 |
| 20 | $432 | $1,630 | $1,198 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $4,759 | $3,489 |
- 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
- 0.23%IWP
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
IWP 22nd cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs IWP Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- IWP 0.40%
- IMCG $0.62
- IWP $0.53
- IMCG $0.19
- IWP $0.15
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- IWP Sep 15, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- IWP Sep 18, 2026
- IMCG Quarterly
- IWP Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCG vs IWP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCG
- IWP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%, betterIWP 17.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97, betterIWP 0.65
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%, betterIWP −38.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14IWP 1.13
IMCG and IWP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


