XLF ranks 1st and IXG 5th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
IXG vs XLF
XLF −0.30pt a year
0.38%0.08%
XLF 611.6×the volume
54K33M
XLF +0.9pt
+12.3%+13.2%
IXG vs XLF Performance
+79.2%+52.9%
- IXG 0.38%
- XLF 0.08%, better
- IXG $698M
- XLF $53.1B
- IXG +15.6%, better
- XLF +9.6%
- IXG 2.19%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- IXG 244
- XLF 79
- IXG 54K sh
- XLF 33M sh, better
- IXG $129.29
- XLF $56.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IXG | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A85 | A85 |
| Risk | A86Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | D35 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A79Higher | C42 |
| Durability | B59 | A81Higher |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. IXG and XLF are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IXGB
XLFA
In short
IXG Most financials ETFs stop at the US border. This one, running since 2001, owns the sector worldwide: roughly 220 banks, insurers and exchanges, priced below the typical financials fund.
XLF The 1998 original. XLF holds the S&P 500's financial sector, roughly 80 banks, insurers, card networks and exchanges, for 0.08% a year. Not the whole sector, the blue-chip end of it, and one of the most heavily traded ways to own it.
Stated mandate
IXG The fund seeks to track an index of global equities in the financials sector, providing diversified exposure to financial companies worldwide.
XLF The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Financial Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IXG vs XLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IXG vs XLF Cost
Overpaying IXG vs XLF
$6,017
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IXG 0.38%
$7,706
XLF 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IXG | XLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $147 | $541 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $575 | $2,083 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $1,689 | $6,017 |
- 0.38%IXG
- 0.08%XLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLF cheapest of 18 funds
IXG 11th cheapest of 18 funds
IXG vs XLF Dividends
- IXG 2.19%, better
- XLF 1.46%
- IXG $2.83
- XLF $0.83
- IXG $1.76
- XLF $0.20
- IXG Jun 15, 2026
- XLF Sep 21, 2026
- IXG Jun 18, 2026
- XLF Sep 23, 2026
- IXG Twice a year
- XLF Quarterly
Distribution history
IXG vs XLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IXG
- XLF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IXG 12.8%, betterXLF 15.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- IXG 1.58, betterXLF 1.13
- Worst fall
- IXG −27.2%XLF −25.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IXG 0.81XLF 0.75
IXG and XLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





