JANP vs JUNT: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

JANPBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF

JUNTBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

JANP −0.24pt a year

JANP0.50%JUNT0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

JUNT 1.04×the volume

JANP9.46KJUNT9.86K

JANP vs JUNT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.9%JANP+7.2%JUNT

Expense ratio: JANP 0.50%, better; JUNT 0.74%
Fund size: JANP $57M; JUNT $111M
1Y total return: JANP +11.9%, better; JUNT +7.2%
Holdings: JANP 4; JUNT 3
Avg volume (30D): JANP 9.46K sh; JUNT 9.86K sh, better
NAV per share: JANP $35.06; JUNT $37.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for JANP, JUNT, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	JANP	JUNT
Cost30% weight	A91Higher	B68
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B60Higher	C53
Tradability15% weight	D28	C41Higher
Holdings10% weight	Not scored	B59
Durability5% weight	C46Higher	C43

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. JANP and JUNT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds

See all 77 ›

JANP ranks 4th and JUNT 24th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
Rank 4BJANPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 65
Rank 4BOCTTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETFScore 65
Rank 22BSIXZAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETFScore 57
Rank 24BJUNTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETFScore 56
Rank 24BSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JANPBPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

JUNTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF

In short

JANP No data

JUNT A one-year seatbelt bolted to the largest S&P 500 ETF: JUNT absorbs the first 10% of that fund's price decline between June 1 and May 31, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap that resets each June.

Stated mandate

JANP No data

JUNT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's share-price return over the June 1–May 31 outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

JANP No data

JUNT The first 10% of the reference ETF's price decline over each June 1 to May 31 stretch is absorbed before your losses start. That is written into the fund's own filings, not implied.
Costs 0.74% a year, below the median fee in its shallow-buffer cohort of 50-plus funds, and the same rate AllianzIM charges on six-month siblings SIXD and SIXJ.
It reloads on its own: a fresh outcome period, buffer and new cap begin every June 1, so there is no roll trade to diary.
Sits among the stronger builds in a crowded shallow-buffer field of more than fifty competing funds.

Worth knowing

JANP No data

JUNT Upside stops at a cap struck each June 1 off option prices, so in a powerful rally you keep less than the reference ETF does.
Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left at that price. The stated terms describe a full June-to-May hold, not a partial one.
No distribution stream here; the outcome shows up in share price. The fund also launched in 2023, so its history is short.

Full JANP profile⁠

Full JUNT profile⁠

JANP vs JUNT Holdings

How JANP and JUNT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

Asset classAlternatives, Stocks0.0%
Holdings0 in both0.0%
Countryby domicile100%
Sector11 Sectors99.7%

Sector

Sector weights in JANP and JUNT, widest gap first
Sector	Gap	JANP	JUNT
Technology	JANP +0.3 points	36.7%	36.4%
Financials	JUNT +0.1 points	12.5%	12.6%
Consumer Staples	Same weight	5.1%	5.1%
Health Care	JUNT +0.1 points	10.5%	10.6%
Consumer Discretionary	Same weight	9.7%	9.7%
Communication	Same weight	8.8%	8.8%
Utilities	Same weight	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	Same weight	1.9%	1.9%
Materials	Same weight	1.6%	1.6%
Energy	Same weight	3.5%	3.5%
Industrials	Same weight	7.6%	7.6%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JANP and JUNT, widest gap first
Country	Gap	JANP	JUNT
United States	Same weight	99.5%	99.5%
Switzerland	Same weight	0.3%	0.3%
China	Same weight	0.1%	0.1%
Mexico	Same weight	0.1%	0.1%
Ireland	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%
United Kingdom	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

JANP101.0%
JUNT102.9%

Securities held

JANP3
JUNT2

Asset class

JANP: Alternatives
JUNT: Stocks

Holdings

Only in JANP3
In both0
Only in JUNT2

Only in JANP

3 securities, 100% of JANP by weight

4SPY Us 12/31/26 C6.8299.22%
4SPY Us 12/31/26 P681.921.19%
Net Current Assets<0.01%

Only in JUNT

2 securities, 100% of JUNT by weight

Spy 05/28/2027 5.60 C97.30%
Spy 05/28/2027 756.40 P5.59%

Weight gaps

JANP and JUNT share no securities.

All JANP holdings⁠All 5 JUNT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JANP vs JUNT Cost

Overpaying JUNT vs JANP

$4,328

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

JANP 0.50%
$9,979
JUNT 0.74%
$14,307

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

JANP 0.50%
JUNT 0.74%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	JANP	JUNT	Overpaying
10	$900	$1,319	$419
20	$3,460	$5,015	$1,555
30	$9,979	$14,307	$4,328

Expense ratio

0.50%JANP, cheaper
0.74%JUNT

JANP0.50%JUNT0.74%

0.25%0.85%

Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Median 0.79%

JANP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

JUNT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

JANP vs JUNT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026

Payout (12M): JANP None; JUNT None

Distribution history

JANPAll JANP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUNTAll JUNT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JANP vs JUNT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: JANP 6.3%since Feb 2024JUNT 6.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: JANP 1.33since Feb 2024JUNT 1.42
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: JANP −12.2%since Jan 2024JUNT −12.8%since Jun 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: JANP 0.50JUNT 0.53; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

JANPBvsZALTA
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.69%
Category
JUNTBvsZALTA
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Expense ratio
0.74% · 0.69%
Category
JANPBvsAUGPB
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.50%
Category
JUNTBvsAUGPB
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August
Expense ratio
0.74% · 0.50%
Category
JANPBvsSIXJB
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.74%
Category
JUNTBvsSIXJB
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
Expense ratio
0.74% · 0.74%
Category