Skip to content

JUNT vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF

JUNTBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

JUNT0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 13.7×the volume

JUNT9.86KZALT135K

3Y return · a year

JUNT +3.7pt

JUNT+13.7%ZALT+10.0%

JUNT vs ZALT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+7.2%JUNT+7.7%ZALT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. JUNT +7.2%. ZALT +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2%4%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JUNT 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
JUNT $111M
ZALT $835M
1Y total return
JUNT +7.2%
ZALT +7.7%, better
Holdings
JUNT 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
JUNT 9.86K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
JUNT $37.54
ZALT $34.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUNT: Cost 68, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 59, Durability 43. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 73, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUNT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUNTZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC53A73Higher
Tradability15% weightC41B65Higher
Holdings10% weightB59A89Higher
Durability5% weightC43B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUNT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and JUNT 24th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 22BSIXZAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 24BJUNTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 24BSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUNTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

JUNT A one-year seatbelt bolted to the largest S&P 500 ETF: JUNT absorbs the first 10% of that fund's price decline between June 1 and May 31, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap that resets each June.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

JUNT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's share-price return over the June 1–May 31 outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • JUNT The first 10% of the reference ETF's price decline over each June 1 to May 31 stretch is absorbed before your losses start. That is written into the fund's own filings, not implied.
  • Costs 0.74% a year, below the median fee in its shallow-buffer cohort of 50-plus funds, and the same rate AllianzIM charges on six-month siblings SIXD and SIXJ.
  • It reloads on its own: a fresh outcome period, buffer and new cap begin every June 1, so there is no roll trade to diary.
  • Sits among the stronger builds in a crowded shallow-buffer field of more than fifty competing funds.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • JUNT Upside stops at a cap struck each June 1 off option prices, so in a powerful rally you keep less than the reference ETF does.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left at that price. The stated terms describe a full June-to-May hold, not a partial one.
  • No distribution stream here; the outcome shows up in share price. The fund also launched in 2023, so its history is short.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full JUNT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

JUNT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUNT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying JUNT vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUNT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUNT 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JUNT $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearJUNTZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JUNT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

JUNT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

JUNT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
JUNT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

JUNTAll JUNT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUNT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUNT 6.9%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUNT 1.42ZALT 1.51, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUNT −12.8%since Jun 2023ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUNT 0.53ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • JUNTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNTBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNTBvsJANPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jun ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.