ZALT ranks 1st and JUNT 24th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
JUNT vs ZALT
ZALT −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.69%
ZALT 13.7×the volume
9.86K135K
JUNT +3.7pt
+13.7%+10.0%
JUNT vs ZALT Performance
+7.2%+7.7%
- JUNT 0.74%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- JUNT $111M
- ZALT $835M
- JUNT +7.2%
- ZALT +7.7%, better
- JUNT 3
- ZALT 503
- JUNT 9.86K sh
- ZALT 135K sh, better
- JUNT $37.54
- ZALT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUNT | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C53 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | C41 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C43 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. JUNT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUNTB
ZALTA
In short
JUNT A one-year seatbelt bolted to the largest S&P 500 ETF: JUNT absorbs the first 10% of that fund's price decline between June 1 and May 31, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap that resets each June.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
JUNT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's share-price return over the June 1–May 31 outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUNT vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUNT vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying JUNT vs ZALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUNT 0.74%
$14,307
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUNT | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,232 | $87 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $4,697 | $318 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $13,429 | $878 |
- 0.74%JUNT
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
JUNT 17th cheapest of 77 funds
JUNT vs ZALT Dividends
- JUNT None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
JUNT vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUNT 6.9%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JUNT 1.42ZALT 1.51, better
- Worst fall
- JUNT −12.8%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- JUNT 0.53ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.