MUB ranks 2nd and JCAL 58th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
JCAL vs MUB
MUB −0.39pt a year
0.44%0.05%
MUB 133.8×the volume
69.5K9.29M
JCAL vs MUB Performance
−0.2%−0.6%
- JCAL 0.44%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- JCAL $511M
- MUB $54.4B
- JCAL
- MUB +0.1%
- JCAL
- MUB 3.28%
- JCAL 324
- MUB 7950
- JCAL 69.5K sh
- MUB 9.29M sh, better
- JCAL $48.71
- MUB $103.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JCAL | MUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D39 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | A82Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A93Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. JCAL and MUB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JCALD
MUBA
In short
JCAL California munis in an ETF wrapper, run by people instead of an index: roughly 300 bonds picked for income exempt from federal and California tax, at 0.44% a year.
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
Stated mandate
JCAL The fund seeks federal tax-exempt income and capital preservation for California residents through a diversified portfolio primarily consisting of tax-exempt California municipal bonds. It uses credit analysis and seeks to keep effective duration within two years of its benchmark.
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JCAL vs MUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JCAL vs MUB Cost
Overpaying JCAL vs MUB
$7,792
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JCAL 0.44%
$8,852
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JCAL | MUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $794 | $92 | $702 |
| 20 | $3,061 | $360 | $2,701 |
| 30 | $8,852 | $1,060 | $7,792 |
- 0.44%JCAL
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
JCAL 54th cheapest of 63 funds
JCAL vs MUB Dividends
- JCAL
- MUB 3.28%
- JCAL
- MUB $3.42
- JCAL $0.14
- MUB $0.28
- JCAL Oct 1, 2026
- MUB Oct 1, 2026
- JCAL Oct 5, 2026
- MUB Oct 6, 2026
- JCAL Monthly
- MUB Monthly
Distribution history
JCAL vs MUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JCAL MUB 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- JCAL MUB −0.03
- Worst fall
- JCAL MUB −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- JCAL 1.01MUB 0.90
JCAL and MUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.44% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





