VCRM ranks 4th and JCAL 58th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
JCAL vs VCRM
VCRM −0.32pt a year
0.44%0.12%
VCRM 9.8×the volume
69.5K679K
JCAL vs VCRM Performance
−0.2%−0.4%
- JCAL 0.44%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- JCAL $511M
- VCRM $2.2B
- JCAL
- VCRM +1.1%
- JCAL
- VCRM 3.81%
- JCAL 324
- VCRM 2588
- JCAL 69.5K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- JCAL $48.71
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JCAL | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D39 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. JCAL and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JCALD
VCRMA
In short
JCAL California munis in an ETF wrapper, run by people instead of an index: roughly 300 bonds picked for income exempt from federal and California tax, at 0.44% a year.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
JCAL The fund seeks federal tax-exempt income and capital preservation for California residents through a diversified portfolio primarily consisting of tax-exempt California municipal bonds. It uses credit analysis and seeks to keep effective duration within two years of its benchmark.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JCAL vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JCAL vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying JCAL vs VCRM
$6,332
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JCAL 0.44%
$8,852
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JCAL | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $794 | $220 | $574 |
| 20 | $3,061 | $859 | $2,202 |
| 30 | $8,852 | $2,520 | $6,332 |
- 0.44%JCAL
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
JCAL 54th cheapest of 63 funds
JCAL vs VCRM Dividends
- JCAL
- VCRM 3.81%
- JCAL
- VCRM $2.82
- JCAL $0.14
- VCRM $0.21
- JCAL Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- JCAL Oct 5, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- JCAL Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
JCAL vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JCAL VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JCAL VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- JCAL VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- JCAL 1.01VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.44% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.