SCHZ ranks 2nd and JCPB 45th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
JCPB vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.37pt a year
0.40%0.03%
JCPB 1.1×the volume
2.71M2.37M
JCPB +1.0pt
+0.8%−0.2%
JCPB vs SCHZ Performance
+3.9%−1.0%
- JCPB 0.40%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- JCPB $17.5B
- SCHZ $10.8B
- JCPB +0.4%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- JCPB 4.97%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- JCPB 2808
- SCHZ 12610
- JCPB 2.71M sh, better
- SCHZ 2.37M sh
- JCPB $45.49
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JCPB | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B62Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B61 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A78Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. JCPB and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JCPBB
SCHZA
In short
JCPB The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate is JCPB's yardstick, not its cage. J.P. Morgan's bond desk builds a mostly investment-grade core, then reaches into high yield and foreign debt for extra income. Cost: 0.40% a year.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
JCPB The ETF seeks a high level of current income from investment-grade and non-investment-grade securities. It mainly uses investment-grade bonds, while combining bottom-up selection, dynamic sector allocation, and macro analysis of the yield curve, duration, and portfolio risk.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JCPB vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JCPB vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying JCPB vs SCHZ
$7,452
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JCPB 0.40%
$8,090
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JCPB | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $55 | $668 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $216 | $2,577 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $638 | $7,452 |
- 0.40%JCPB
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
JCPB 74th cheapest of 114 funds
JCPB vs SCHZ Dividends
- JCPB 4.97%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- JCPB $2.27
- SCHZ $0.96
- JCPB $0.18
- SCHZ $0.08
- JCPB Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- JCPB Oct 5, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- JCPB Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
JCPB vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JCPB
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JCPB 5.6%SCHZ 5.6%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- JCPB 0.36, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- JCPB −16.4%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- JCPB 1.00SCHZ 0.99
JCPB and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
