Skip to content

JDOC vs TRUT

JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF

JDOCCNasdaq

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTBNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.51pt a year

JDOC0.65%TRUT0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

TRUT 468.4×the volume

JDOC389TRUT182K

JDOC vs TRUT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+20.3%JDOC+9.6%TRUT

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. JDOC +20.3%. TRUT +9.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JDOC 0.65%
TRUT 0.14%, better
Fund size
JDOC $10M
TRUT $238M
1Y total return
JDOC +20.3%, better
TRUT +9.6%
Yield (12M)
JDOC 0.78%, better
TRUT 0.36%
Holdings
JDOC 56
TRUT 77
Avg volume (30D)
JDOC 389 sh
TRUT 182K sh, better
NAV per share
JDOC $65.60
TRUT $31.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JDOC: Cost 43, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 4, Holdings 57, Durability 40. TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for JDOC, TRUT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJDOCTRUT
Cost30% weightC43A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherF23
Tradability15% weightF4A96Higher
Holdings10% weightB57HigherD31
Durability5% weightC40B61Higher

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JDOC and TRUT are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TRUT ranks 4th and JDOC 23rd of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2ATMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BTRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 22CJPREJPMorgan Realty Income ETFScore 44
  7. Rank 23CJDOCJPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETFScore 41
  8. Rank 24CDPREVirtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Income ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JDOCCJPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF

TRUTBVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

In short

JDOC Most healthcare ETFs just buy the sector list. JDOC is the stock-picker's version: about 60 names chosen by J.P. Morgan healthcare specialists hunting companies whose future growth the market underrates, with the whole globe in bounds.

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

Stated mandate

JDOC Seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in healthcare companies that the adviser considers leaders, particularly where future growth is underappreciated by the market.

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

Why people hold it

  • JDOC Concentrated by design: about 60 healthcare stocks rather than the full sector roster, so the managers' picks actually shape the portfolio.jpmorgan.com
  • The mandate is global, so European and Asian drugmakers and device firms are as eligible as US-listed ones.jpmorgan.com
  • Run by J.P. Morgan portfolio managers who specialize in healthcare inside its equity research groups, leaning on the firm's global bench of sector analysts.sec.govjpmorgan.com
  • 0.65% a year for specialist active research sits right at the median fee for actively managed US equity ETFs, not a markup for the J.P. Morgan name.
  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.

Worth knowing

  • JDOC A small fund that trades thinly since its 2023 launch, so spreads can run wider than on the giant healthcare index ETFs and execution matters more.
  • One sector, roughly 60 names. Drug pricing rules, patent cliffs and trial outcomes land harder here than in a diversified fund.prnewswire.com
  • Broad active core rivals like DFAC and AVLC charge under 0.2% for far wider portfolios. JDOC's fee reflects a narrow specialist mandate, not a core holding's price.
  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.

Full JDOC profile⁠

Full TRUT profile⁠

JDOC vs TRUT Holdings

How JDOC and TRUT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JDOC and 0.0% of TRUT.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile76.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for TRUT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JDOC and TRUT, widest gap first
CountryMore in JDOCMore in TRUT
United StatesTRUT +22.9 points
SwitzerlandJDOC +8.1 points
United KingdomJDOC +5.2 points
DenmarkJDOC +4.2 points
GermanyJDOC +2.5 points
JapanJDOC +1.9 points
IsraelJDOC +1.5 points
Other countries (2)TRUT +0.4 points

Outside the US: JDOC 94% developed, 6% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JDOC49.7%
  • TRUT86.6%

Securities held

  • JDOC54
  • TRUT76

Asset class

JDOC
Equity
TRUT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JDOC54
  • In both0
  • Only in TRUT76

Only in JDOC

54 securities, 99.3% of JDOC by weight

  • Eli Lilly and Company8.83%
  • AbbVie Inc Common Stock8.43%
  • UnitedHealth Group Inc5.37%

Only in TRUT

76 securities, 100% of TRUT by weight

  • Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund30.49%
  • Apple Inc15.89%
  • Nvidia Corp15.65%

Weight gaps

JDOC and TRUT share no securities.

All 54 JDOC holdings⁠All 75 TRUT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JDOC vs TRUT Cost

Overpaying JDOC vs TRUT

$9,785

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JDOC 0.65%

    $12,717

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JDOC 0.65%
  • TRUT 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JDOC $12,717TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearJDOCTRUTOverpaying
10$1,163$256$907
20$4,440$1,000$3,440
30$12,717$2,932$9,785

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%JDOC
  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

JDOC 19th cheapest of 35 funds

JDOC vs TRUT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
JDOC 0.78%, better
TRUT 0.36%
Payout (12M)
JDOC $0.51
TRUT $0.11
Last payment
JDOC $0.51
TRUT $0.03
Ex-dividend
JDOC Dec 16, 2025
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
JDOC Dec 18, 2025
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
JDOC Annual
TRUT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

JDOCAnnual · 4 paymentsAll JDOC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2023 $0.08; Dec 16, 2024 $2.49; Dec 24, 2024 $0.33; Dec 16, 2025 $0.51. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

JDOC vs TRUT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JDOC 14.3%since Dec 2023TRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JDOC 0.52since Dec 2023TRUT 0.78since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JDOC −20.8%since Nov 2023TRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JDOC 0.47TRUT 1.76

Popular comparisons

  • JDOCCvsAVREA

    JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTBvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JDOCCvsPSRA

    JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTBvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JDOCCvsTMEDA

    JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTBvsTMEDA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.