JGRW vs QIDX: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Jensen Quality Growth ETF

JGRWCNYSE Arca

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

QIDXBNYSE Arca

Overlap

14.7%by weight

Expense ratio

QIDX −0.07pt a year

JGRW0.57%QIDX0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

JGRW 3.8×the volume

JGRW14.8KQIDX3.94K

JGRW vs QIDX Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+7.0%JGRW+8.7%QIDX

Expense ratio: JGRW 0.57%; QIDX 0.50%, better
Fund size: JGRW $62M; QIDX $39M
1Y total return: JGRW +7.0%; QIDX +8.7%, better
Yield (12M): JGRW 0.38%; QIDX 0.91%, better
Holdings: JGRW 30; QIDX 130
Avg volume (30D): JGRW 14.8K sh, better; QIDX 3.94K sh
NAV per share: JGRW $28.42; QIDX $11.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for JGRW, QIDX, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	JGRW	QIDX
Cost30% weight	B56	A75Higher
Mission25% weight	A73	Not scored
Risk15% weight	C41	A76Higher
Tradability15% weight	B66Higher	F23
Holdings10% weight	C48	A93Higher
Durability5% weight	B55Higher	C45

Rank among US Active Quality funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. JGRW and QIDX are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds

See all 16 ›

QIDX ranks 4th and JGRW 7th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66
Rank 4BQIDXIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETFScore 64
Rank 5BQFFQualivian Focus Fund ETFScore 58
Rank 6BABIGArgent Large Cap ETFScore 56
Rank 7CJGRWJensen Quality Growth ETFScore 54
Rank 8CBBHLBBH Select Large Cap ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JGRWCJensen Quality Growth ETF

QIDXBIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

In short

JGRW Jensen's in-house quality-and-growth screen, put in an ETF wrapper in 2024. No index license, no closet benchmark: one manager's definition of a durable US grower, priced right at the middle of its peer group.

QIDX An active quality fund stitched from Indexperts' own house indexes: steady-earnings names across large, mid and small caps, with a manager free to override the rules. It charges less than the typical fund in its peer group.

Stated mandate

JGRW The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

QIDX The Fund seeks total return.

Why people hold it

JGRW The screen is the product: a named, proprietary quality-and-growth test on US stocks, and the portfolio has stuck close to that stated brief.
0.57% a year is dead-center for its quality and free-cash-flow peer group. Human stock picking without an above-market toll.
Plainly stated job: long-term capital appreciation from US equities, with cash paid out quarterly rather than dressed up as the main event.

QIDX Charges 0.50% a year, below the median for its quality-focused peer group and about half what the priciest name in that group (EQTY, 0.99%) asks.
Rules first, judgment second: the portfolio is drawn from Indexperts' own growth and consistent-value indexes, with the advisor free to trim or exclude.sec.gov
Reaches across large, mid and small caps instead of hugging a handful of mega caps, and the portfolio build ranks among the stronger ones in its peer group.sec.gov
A plain 1940 Act equity fund seeking total return, with cash paid out quarterly. No leverage, no options overlay, no derivatives wrapper to decode.

Worth knowing

JGRW Trading is light. Spreads can widen at the open and close, so how you place the order matters more here than in a mega-cap index fund.
Launched in 2024, so there is only a short live record. Its risk profile is measured off limited history and sits in the lower half of its cohort.
Cheaper quality exposure exists in the same cohort: PSET charges 0.15%. The extra cost here buys Jensen's selection, not quality as a factor.

QIDX Listed at the end of 2024, so the track record is short and any read on its risk profile rests on limited history.
Small and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than on giant index funds, and size of order matters more.
You are paying 0.50% for a manager's judgment when index-built quality rivals like PSET run 0.15%.

Full JGRW profile⁠

Full QIDX profile⁠

JGRW vs QIDX Holdings

How JGRW and QIDX differ

Overlap by weight

14.7%

Shared holdings make up 47.9% of JGRW and 14.7% of QIDX.

Level by level

Holdings13 in both14.7%
Countryby domicile98.8%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for JGRW and QIDX.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JGRW and QIDX, widest gap first
Country	More in JGRWMore in QIDX	JGRW	QIDX
United States	JGRW +1.1 points	100.0%	98.8%
Singapore	QIDX +0.6 points	0.0%	0.6%
Sweden	QIDX +0.5 points	0.0%	0.5%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

JGRW54.9%
QIDX25.0%

Securities held

JGRW29
QIDX129

Asset class

JGRW: Equity
QIDX: Equity

Holdings

Only in JGRW16
In both13
Only in QIDX116

Only in JGRW

16 securities, 52.1% of JGRW by weight

Amazon.com Inc7.07%
Marsh & McLennan Cos Inc5.03%
Waste Management Inc4.87%
NVIDIA Corp4.81%
Broadcom Inc4.16%
Motorola Solutions Inc4.02%
Sherwin-Williams Co/The3.87%
Veeva Systems Inc3.57%
Procter & Gamble Co/The2.86%
Cintas Corp2.82%
IDEXX Laboratories Inc2.55%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc1.86%
Intuitive Surgical Inc1.57%
Equifax Inc1.50%
Copart Inc1.15%
First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20400.34%

Only in QIDX

116 securities, 82.8% of QIDX by weight

Arista Networks, Inc.3.56%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.3.36%
HEICO Corporation2.55%
Xom2.40%
Walmart Inc.1.90%
Altria Group Ord1.87%
Cencora, Inc.1.79%
Williams Co INC1.77%
Cisco Systems, Inc.1.75%
F5 Ord1.73%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B1.62%
Costco Wholesale Corporation1.53%
Verizon Communications Ord1.49%
Kroger Co.1.44%
S&P Global, Inc.1.40%
International Business Machines Corporation1.34%
AutoZone, Inc.1.31%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation Class A1.19%
VICI Properties Inc1.13%
NRG Energy, Inc.1.13%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.1.06%
Hormel Foods Corporation1.06%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1.03%
JPMorgan Chase Ord0.98%
T-Mobile US, Inc.0.96%
Aecom Ord0.94%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.0.89%
Gev0.86%
Travelers Companies, Inc.0.84%
Royal Caribbean Group Ord0.84%
Graham Holdings Class B Ord0.82%
Acadian Asset Management Inc0.78%
Dorman Products Ord0.77%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Ord0.75%
Timken Company0.72%
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated0.71%
Ralph Lauren Corporation Class A0.70%
Caterpillar Inc.0.69%
Linde plc0.68%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.0.66%
PACCAR Inc0.65%
Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.0.65%
Centene Corporation0.65%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.0.64%
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. Class A0.63%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.0.62%
Caci International Class A Ord0.62%
Matson, Inc.0.60%
Packaging Corporation of America0.60%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.0.57%

Weight gaps

All 13 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in JGRW and QIDX, widest gap first
Holding	More in JGRWMore in QIDX	JGRW	QIDX
Microsoft CorpMSFT	JGRW +6.55 points	7.22%	0.67%
Mastercard IncMA	JGRW +5.24 points	5.90%	0.66%
Eli Lilly & CoLLY	JGRW +3.44 points	4.68%	1.24%
Alphabet IncGOOGL	JGRW +3.23 points	5.82%	2.59%
Apple IncAAPL	JGRW +2.94 points	5.38%	2.44%
TJX Cos Inc/TheTJX	JGRW +2.21 points	2.85%	0.64%
Cadence Design Systems IncCDNS	JGRW +2.13 points	2.75%	0.62%
Stryker CorpSYK	JGRW +1.94 points	3.15%	1.21%
Verisk Analytics IncVRSK	JGRW +1.85 points	2.22%	0.37%
Abbott LaboratoriesABT	JGRW +1.38 points	2.59%	1.21%
Kla CorpKLAC	JGRW +0.96 points	2.21%	1.25%
Amphenol CorpAPH	JGRW +0.71 points	1.86%	1.15%
American Express CoAXP	JGRW +0.64 points	1.29%	0.65%

All JGRW holdings⁠All 130 QIDX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JGRW vs QIDX Cost

Overpaying JGRW vs QIDX

$1,292

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

JGRW 0.57%
$11,271
QIDX 0.50%
$9,979

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

JGRW 0.57%
QIDX 0.50%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	JGRW	QIDX	Overpaying
10	$1,023	$900	$123
20	$3,921	$3,460	$461
30	$11,271	$9,979	$1,292

Expense ratio

0.57%JGRW
0.50%QIDX, cheaper

QIDX0.50%JGRW0.57%

0.40%1.52%

Middle half of US Active Quality funds
Median 0.65%

QIDX 4th cheapest of 16 funds

JGRW 7th cheapest of 16 funds

JGRW vs QIDX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026

Yield (12M): JGRW 0.38%; QIDX 0.91%, better
Payout (12M): JGRW $0.11; QIDX $0.11
Last payment: JGRW $0.02; QIDX $0.03
Ex-dividend: JGRW Sep 18, 2026; QIDX Sep 29, 2026
Paid on: JGRW Sep 21, 2026; QIDX Sep 30, 2026
Frequency: JGRW Quarterly; QIDX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

JGRWQuarterly · 9 paymentsAll JGRW payments⁠

QIDXQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll QIDX payments⁠

JGRW vs QIDX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: JGRW 11.4%since Sep 2024QIDX 9.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: JGRW 0.04since Sep 2024QIDX 0.25since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: JGRW −14.6%since Aug 2024QIDX −15.0%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: JGRW 0.83QIDX 0.57; Market = 1

JGRW and QIDX in the news

All news⁠

New ETFs
Two old strategies got ETF tickers. Jensen's new one lets a rule pick the stocks.
Oct 5, 2026JGRW
New ETFs
Jensen's first passive ETF charges 0.25% for a 10-year profit test
Oct 5, 2026JGRW

Popular comparisons

JGRWCvsNPFEA
Jensen Quality Growth ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf
Expense ratio
0.57% · 0.40%
Category
QIDXBvsNPFEA
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.40%
Category
JGRWCvsQLTYA
Jensen Quality Growth ETF · GMO US Quality ETF
Expense ratio
0.57% · 0.50%
Category
QIDXBvsQLTYA
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · GMO US Quality ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.50%
Category
JGRWCvsAQECB
Jensen Quality Growth ETF · AQE Core ETF
Expense ratio
0.57% · 0.49%
Category
QIDXBvsAQECB
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · AQE Core ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.49%
Category

JGRW vs QIDX

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How JGRW and QIDX differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in JGRW

Only in QIDX

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Two old strategies got ETF tickers. Jensen's new one lets a rule pick the stocks.

Jensen's first passive ETF charges 0.25% for a 10-year profit test

How JGRW and QIDX differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in JGRW

Only in QIDX

Weight gaps