VCRM ranks 2nd and JHMU 30th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
JHMU vs VCRM
VCRM −0.27pt a year
0.39%0.12%
VCRM 18.0×the volume
37.6K679K
JHMU vs VCRM Performance
+1.4%+1.2%
- JHMU 0.39%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- JHMU $104M
- VCRM $2.2B
- JHMU +1.4%, better
- VCRM +1.2%
- JHMU 3.72%
- VCRM 4.10%, better
- JHMU 337
- VCRM 2595
- JHMU 37.6K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- JHMU $25.58
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JHMU | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A74Higher | B68 |
| Tradability | B57 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C44 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. JHMU and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JHMUB
VCRMA
In short
JHMU John Hancock's first muni ETF skips the index and hunts pricing imbalances bond by bond, favoring revenue bonds with call protection. That active work runs 0.39% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
JHMU The fund seeks a high level of interest income that is exempt from federal income tax. Its strategy uses pricing imbalances within the municipal bond market.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JHMU vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JHMU vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying JHMU vs VCRM
$5,378
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JHMU 0.39%
$7,898
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JHMU | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $220 | $485 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $859 | $1,866 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $2,520 | $5,378 |
- 0.39%JHMU
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
JHMU 47th cheapest of 63 funds
JHMU vs VCRM Dividends
- JHMU 3.72%
- VCRM 4.10%, better
- JHMU $0.95
- VCRM $3.03
- JHMU $0.04
- VCRM $0.21
- JHMU Oct 28, 2026
- VCRM Nov 2, 2026
- JHMU Oct 30, 2026
- VCRM Pays Nov 4, 2026
- JHMU Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
JHMU vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JHMU 4.9%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JHMU −0.03VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- JHMU −6.2%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- JHMU 0.19VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.