SCHZ ranks 2nd and JIII 87th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
JIII vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.51pt a year
0.54%0.03%
SCHZ 43.1×the volume
54.9K2.37M
JIII vs SCHZ Performance
+1.8%−0.2%
- JIII 0.54%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- JIII $339M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- JIII +1.8%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- JIII 7.66%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- JIII 577
- SCHZ 12610
- JIII 54.9K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- JIII $48.38
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JIII | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A82Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | D34 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A78Higher |
| Durability | C40 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. JIII and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JIIIC
SCHZA
In short
JIII Active multi-sector income from Janus Henderson, built to sit between a core bond fund and a single-sector high-yield fund. Pays monthly. Costs 0.54%, net of a waiver through February 28, 2028.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
JIII The fund seeks long-term returns through a combination of income and capital growth.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JIII vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JIII vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying JIII vs SCHZ
$10,082
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JIII 0.54%
$10,720
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JIII | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $971 | $55 | $916 |
| 20 | $3,724 | $216 | $3,508 |
| 30 | $10,720 | $638 | $10,082 |
- 0.54%JIII
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
JIII 96th cheapest of 114 funds
JIII vs SCHZ Dividends
- JIII 7.66%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- JIII $3.71
- SCHZ $0.96
- JIII $0.22
- SCHZ $0.08
- JIII Oct 30, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- JIII Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- JIII Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
JIII vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JIII 3.0%SCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JIII 0.10SCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- JIII −3.5%SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- JIII 0.14SCHZ 0.99
JIII and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.54% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
