JMBS ranks 1st and TRBF 6th of 10 funds in the Core Securitized Bond Category.
JMBS vs TRBF
JMBS −0.23pt a year
0.21%0.44%
JMBS 118.1×the volume
841K7.12K
JMBS vs TRBF Performance
+0.1%0.0%
- JMBS 0.21%, better
- TRBF 0.44%
- JMBS $6.37B
- TRBF $50M
- JMBS +0.1%, better
- TRBF 0.0%
- JMBS 5.85%
- TRBF
- JMBS 415
- TRBF 319
- JMBS 841K sh, better
- TRBF 7.12K sh
- JMBS $43.40
- TRBF $47.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JMBS | TRBF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | D35 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A90 |
| Risk | D35 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | A90Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | F16 | C43Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | D35 |
Rank among Core Securitized Bond funds
Same Category. JMBS and TRBF are both graded against the same 10 Core Securitized Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JMBSA
TRBFB
In short
JMBS The original actively managed mortgage-backed securities ETF, launched in 2018. Rather than replicate the MBS index, the team picks through agency mortgage bonds, a corner of the market where prepayment behavior makes security selection its own craft.
TRBF Angel Oak built its name in mortgage credit, and TRBF is that playbook in an ETF: an actively managed bond fund that hunts relative value across securitized and corporate paper instead of tracking the Agg.
Stated mandate
JMBS The fund seeks a high level of total return through both income and capital appreciation.
TRBF The Fund seeks total return. It is actively managed and allocates among fixed-income asset classes according to the Adviser’s assessment of relative value rather than tracking a specified index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JMBS vs TRBF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JMBS vs TRBF Cost
Overpaying TRBF vs JMBS
$4,495
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JMBS 0.21%
$4,357
TRBF 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JMBS | TRBF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $794 | $411 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $3,061 | $1,570 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $8,852 | $4,495 |
- 0.21%JMBS, cheaper
- 0.44%TRBF
- Middle half of Core Securitized Bond funds
- Median 0.38%
JMBS cheapest of 10 funds
TRBF 7th cheapest of 10 funds
JMBS vs TRBF Dividends
- JMBS 5.85%
- TRBF
- JMBS $2.54
- TRBF
- JMBS $0.19
- TRBF $0.22
- JMBS Oct 30, 2026
- TRBF Oct 30, 2026
- JMBS Pays Nov 5, 2026
- TRBF Pays Nov 2, 2026
- JMBS Monthly
- TRBF Monthly
Distribution history
JMBS vs TRBF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JMBS 6.9%TRBF 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- JMBS 0.31TRBF −0.70
- Worst fall
- JMBS −16.5%TRBF −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- JMBS 1.20TRBF 0.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.