VCRM ranks 4th and JMSI 45th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
JMSI vs VCRM
VCRM −0.34pt a year
0.46%0.12%
VCRM 8.4×the volume
80.4K679K
JMSI vs VCRM Performance
+0.1%+1.1%
- JMSI 0.46%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- JMSI $402M
- VCRM $2.2B
- JMSI +0.1%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- JMSI 3.77%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- JMSI 310
- VCRM 2588
- JMSI 80.4K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- JMSI $48.72
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JMSI | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A95 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B63 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B69 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. JMSI and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JMSIC
VCRMA
In short
JMSI A muni fund where "sustainable" has a definition: at least 80% of assets in bonds funding affordable housing, hospitals, schools, water systems and transit. Actively run, value-oriented, tax-exempt income paid monthly.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
JMSI The fund seeks current income exempt from federal income tax by investing in municipal bonds whose proceeds support positive social or environmental benefits.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JMSI vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JMSI vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying JMSI vs VCRM
$6,710
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JMSI 0.46%
$9,230
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JMSI | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $830 | $220 | $610 |
| 20 | $3,195 | $859 | $2,336 |
| 30 | $9,230 | $2,520 | $6,710 |
- 0.46%JMSI
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
JMSI 55th cheapest of 63 funds
JMSI vs VCRM Dividends
- JMSI 3.77%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- JMSI $1.84
- VCRM $2.82
- JMSI $0.16
- VCRM $0.21
- JMSI Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- JMSI Oct 5, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- JMSI Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
JMSI vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JMSI 5.4%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JMSI 0.05VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- JMSI −6.5%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- JMSI 0.82VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.46% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.