SCYB ranks 1st and JNK 14th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
JNK vs SCYB
SCYB −0.37pt a year
0.40%0.03%
JNK 3.1×the volume
3.42M1.1M
JNK +0.1pt
+8.5%+8.4%
JNK vs SCYB Performance
+2.0%+2.0%
- JNK 0.40%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- JNK $6.05B
- SCYB $2.8B
- JNK +2.0%
- SCYB +2.0%
- JNK 6.81%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- JNK 1101
- SCYB 1844
- JNK 3.42M sh, better
- SCYB 1.1M sh
- JNK $92.98
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JNK | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A82 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A91 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A92Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. JNK and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JNKA
SCYBA
In short
JNK A 2007-vintage junk-bond heavyweight that tracks the "Very Liquid" corner of US high yield: roughly 1,200 of the market's more tradable corporate bonds, with income paid monthly.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
JNK The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of an index representing the U.S. high-yield corporate bond market, before fees and expenses.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JNK vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JNK vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying JNK vs SCYB
$7,452
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JNK 0.40%
$8,090
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JNK | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $55 | $668 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $216 | $2,577 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $638 | $7,452 |
- 0.40%JNK
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
JNK 37th cheapest of 84 funds
JNK vs SCYB Dividends
- JNK 6.81%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- JNK $6.33
- SCYB $1.80
- JNK $0.53
- SCYB $0.16
- JNK Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- JNK Oct 6, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- JNK Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
JNK vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JNK 4.8%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JNK 0.80SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- JNK −16.7%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- JNK 0.67SCYB 0.28
JNK and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

