JPFP ranks 4th and KMLM 8th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
JPFP vs KMLM
JPFP −0.31pt a year
0.59%0.90%
KMLM 54.3×the volume
6.22K338K
JPFP vs KMLM Performance
+0.5%+4.7%
- JPFP 0.59%, better
- KMLM 0.90%
- JPFP $122M
- KMLM $596M
- JPFP
- KMLM +20.7%
- JPFP
- KMLM 4.25%
- JPFP 471
- KMLM 8
- JPFP 6.22K sh
- KMLM 338K sh, better
- JPFP $49.66
- KMLM $30.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JPFP | KMLM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D33 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | C42Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C45 | A75Higher |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. JPFP and KMLM are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JPFPB
KMLMC
In short
JPFP Most managed futures ETFs make you sell stocks to make room. JPFP stacks instead: full large-cap U.S. equity exposure plus an active long/short trend program across global equities, bonds, currencies and commodities, for 0.59%.
KMLM Trend following in its purest form: a rules-based index Mount Lucas has published since 1988, going long or short across commodities, currencies and global bonds. No stocks in the mix, by design.
Stated mandate
JPFP The fund seeks capital appreciation by combining an active managed futures strategy with a U.S. large-cap equity strategy in one investment. The managed-futures component uses derivatives for long or short exposure across global equities, fixed income, commodities, and currencies.
KMLM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price performance of the KFA MLM Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JPFP vs KMLM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JPFP vs KMLM Cost
Overpaying KMLM vs JPFP
$5,405
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JPFP 0.59%
$11,635
KMLM 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JPFP | KMLM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $1,593 | $535 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $6,015 | $1,964 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $17,040 | $5,405 |
- 0.59%JPFP, cheaper
- 0.90%KMLM
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
JPFP cheapest of 14 funds
KMLM 9th cheapest of 14 funds
JPFP vs KMLM Dividends
- JPFP
- KMLM 4.25%
- JPFP None
- KMLM $1.30
- JPFP
- KMLM $1.30
- JPFP
- KMLM Dec 22, 2025
- JPFP
- KMLM Dec 23, 2025
- JPFP
- KMLM Annual
Distribution history
JPFP vs KMLM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JPFP KMLM 10.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- JPFP KMLM −0.35
- Worst fall
- JPFP KMLM −27.6%
- Market sensitivity
- JPFP 1.19KMLM −0.26
JPFP and KMLM in the news


Price vs Value
URNJ closed 1.57% below the value of its miners Friday



Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.