Skip to content

JPFP vs KMLM

JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF

JPFPBNasdaq

KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF

KMLMCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JPFP −0.31pt a year

JPFP0.59%KMLM0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

KMLM 54.3×the volume

JPFP6.22KKMLM338K

JPFP vs KMLM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.5%JPFP+4.7%KMLM

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. JPFP +0.5%. KMLM +4.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%2.5%7.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JPFP 0.59%, better
KMLM 0.90%
Fund size
JPFP $122M
KMLM $596M
1Y total return
JPFP No data
KMLM +20.7%
Yield (12M)
JPFP No data
KMLM 4.25%
Holdings
JPFP 471
KMLM 8
Avg volume (30D)
JPFP 6.22K sh
KMLM 338K sh, better
NAV per share
JPFP $49.66
KMLM $30.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JPFP: Cost 100, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 25, Holdings not scored, Durability 45. KMLM: Cost 33, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings not scored, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for JPFP, KMLM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJPFPKMLM
Cost30% weightA100HigherD33
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37C42Higher
Tradability15% weightD25B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC45A75Higher

Rank among Managed Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JPFP and KMLM are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Futures⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

JPFP ranks 4th and KMLM 8th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.

  1. Rank 4BFFUTFidelity Managed Futures ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 4BJPFPJPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 6BDBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 8BCTASimplify Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 45
  5. Rank 8CKMLMKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 10CHOLDHarbor Alpha Layering ETF (HOLD)Score 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JPFPBJPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF

KMLMCKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF

In short

JPFP Most managed futures ETFs make you sell stocks to make room. JPFP stacks instead: full large-cap U.S. equity exposure plus an active long/short trend program across global equities, bonds, currencies and commodities, for 0.59%.

KMLM Trend following in its purest form: a rules-based index Mount Lucas has published since 1988, going long or short across commodities, currencies and global bonds. No stocks in the mix, by design.

Stated mandate

JPFP The fund seeks capital appreciation by combining an active managed futures strategy with a U.S. large-cap equity strategy in one investment. The managed-futures component uses derivatives for long or short exposure across global equities, fixed income, commodities, and currencies.

KMLM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price performance of the KFA MLM Index.

Why people hold it

  • JPFP Stacked, not swapped. Derivatives let the fund carry broad large-cap U.S. equity exposure while the managed futures sleeve runs alongside it in the same wrapper.jpmorgan.com
  • At 0.59% it comes in below the typical managed futures ETF fee and under the top-scoring names in the group, including WTMF at 0.65% and DBMF at 0.85%.
  • The trend sleeve can go long or short global equities, fixed income, currencies and commodities, so it is not locked to the direction of any single market.jpmorgan.com
  • Built by J.P. Morgan's Multi-Asset Solutions team, which ran this stacking approach in its own portfolios before putting it in an ETF. One of the stronger builds in a crowded niche.jpmorgan.com
  • KMLM Tracks the KFA MLM Index, a continuation of the MLM Index first published in 1988, so the rulebook comes with decades of live history rather than a backtest.kraneshares.comkraneshares.com 2
  • Long or short, set by rule: a daily signal compares each market's price to its long-term moving average, so the fund can be positioned short a falling market.kraneshares.com
  • About two dozen futures markets across commodities, currencies and global bonds, with the three baskets weighted by relative historical volatility and members equal-dollar weighted.kraneshares.comkraneshares.com 2
  • Trades futures but sends shareholders a 1099, not a K-1, keeping tax paperwork closer to an ordinary ETF.kraneshares.com

Worth knowing

  • JPFP The live record starts at the 2026 launch, and the fund is still building assets and volume, so spreads can run wider than at the category's biggest names.
  • Both engines use derivatives, and both can go against you at once. Trend models are designed to follow moves, so sharp reversals can whipsaw the futures sleeve.jpmorgan.com
  • Fully active with proprietary models and no benchmark index to check it against, so outcomes ride on the manager's signals rather than a published rulebook.jpmorgan.com
  • KMLM The 0.90% expense ratio buys the futures machinery and sits well above what plain index-tracking funds in its peer group charge.
  • Trend signals need sustained moves. Choppy, direction-free markets are the environment this mechanism handles worst.kraneshares.comkraneshares.com 2
  • It is a non-diversified commodity pool with no equity futures at all, so it moves on its own schedule instead of alongside a stock portfolio.kraneshares.comkraneshares.com 2

Full JPFP profile⁠

Full KMLM profile⁠

JPFP vs KMLM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JPFP vs KMLM Cost

Overpaying KMLM vs JPFP

$5,405

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JPFP 0.59%

    $11,635

  • KMLM 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JPFP 0.59%
  • KMLM 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KMLM $17,040JPFP $11,635

Year by year

YearJPFPKMLMOverpaying
10$1,058$1,593$535
20$4,051$6,015$1,964
30$11,635$17,040$5,405

Expense ratio

  • 0.59%JPFP, cheaper
  • 0.90%KMLM
  • Middle half of Managed Futures funds
  • Median 0.85%

JPFP cheapest of 14 funds

KMLM 9th cheapest of 14 funds

JPFP vs KMLM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JPFP No data
KMLM 4.25%
Payout (12M)
JPFP None
KMLM $1.30
Last payment
JPFP No data
KMLM $1.30
Ex-dividend
JPFP No data
KMLM Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
JPFP No data
KMLM Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
JPFP No data
KMLM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

JPFPAll JPFP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

KMLMAnnual · 4 paymentsAll KMLM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2021 $1.84; Dec 28, 2022 $4.04; Dec 17, 2024 $0.23; Dec 22, 2025 $1.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

JPFP vs KMLM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JPFP No dataKMLM 10.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JPFP No dataKMLM −0.35
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JPFP No dataKMLM −27.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JPFP 1.19KMLM −0.26

JPFP and KMLM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • JPFPBvsIMFA

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KMLMCvsIMFA

    KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPFPBvsWTMFA

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KMLMCvsWTMFA

    KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPFPBvsISMFB

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KMLMCvsISMFB

    KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.