VONV ranks 1st and JPME 31st of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
JPME vs VONV
VONV −0.18pt a year
0.24%0.06%
VONV 60.8×the volume
12.7K774K
VONV +0.8pt
+11.4%+12.2%
JPME vs VONV Performance
+47.9%+72.9%
- JPME 0.24%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- JPME $493M
- VONV $23.3B
- JPME +20.2%
- VONV +28.9%, better
- JPME 1.77%, better
- VONV 1.53%
- JPME 345
- VONV 887
- JPME 12.7K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- JPME $124.79
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JPME | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B58 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | A80Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B66 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. JPME and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JPMEB
VONVA
In short
JPME Multifactor investing mostly happens in large caps. JPME takes J.P. Morgan's value, quality and momentum rules down a size tier, spreading roughly 400 mid-cap names across an index built to beat plain cap weighting on a risk-adjusted basis.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
JPME The fund seeks U.S. mid-cap equity exposure and aims for better risk-adjusted returns than a market-cap-weighted index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JPME vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JPME vs VONV Cost
Overpaying JPME vs VONV
$3,689
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JPME 0.24%
$4,959
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JPME | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $437 | $110 | $327 |
| 20 | $1,699 | $432 | $1,267 |
| 30 | $4,959 | $1,270 | $3,689 |
- 0.24%JPME
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
JPME 35th cheapest of 99 funds
JPME vs VONV Dividends
- JPME 1.77%, better
- VONV 1.53%
- JPME $2.22
- VONV $1.74
- JPME $0.58
- VONV $0.42
- JPME Sep 22, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- JPME Sep 24, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- JPME Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
JPME vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JPME
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JPME 13.1%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JPME 1.00VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- JPME −19.3%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JPME 0.77VONV 0.85
JPME and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.24% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.24% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

