Skip to content
etf.net

JULC vs XTR

Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

JULCCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTR −0.05pt a year

JULC0.30%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

XTR 1.1×the volume

JULC1.53KXTR1.64K

JULC vs XTR Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 29, 2026

+2.8%JULC+2.5%XTR

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 29, 2026. JULC +2.8%. XTR +2.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JULC 0.30%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
JULC $2M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
JULC No data
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
JULC No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
JULC 4
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
JULC 1.53K sh
XTR 1.64K sh, better
NAV per share
JULC $25.52
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JULC: Cost 97, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 8, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for JULC, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJULCXTR
Cost30% weightA97A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB60HigherF18
Tradability15% weightF8F13Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightF2C46Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JULC and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

JULC ranks 57th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 57CFOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 40
  2. Rank 57CJULCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  3. Rank 57CJUNCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JULCCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

JULC No data

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

JULC No data

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

JULC No data

  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

JULC No data

  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full JULC profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

JULC vs XTR Holdings

As of

How JULC and XTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JULC and 0.0% of XTR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in JULC and XTR, widest gap first
SectorMore in JULCMore in XTR
TechnologyXTR +1.2 points
CommunicationXTR +1.1 points
Health CareJULC +0.6 points
FinancialsJULC +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryJULC +0.4 points
Consumer StaplesJULC +0.4 points
EnergyJULC +0.3 points
UtilitiesJULC +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
MaterialsXTR +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in JULC and XTR, widest gap first
CountryMore in JULCMore in XTR
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • JULC102.5%
  • XTR38.9%

Securities held

  • JULC3
  • XTR505

Asset class

JULC
Equity
XTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in JULC3
  • In both0
  • Only in XTR505

Only in JULC

3 securities, 98.9% of JULC by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 149.14 C75.37%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.25% 06/30/202719.71%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 745.72 P3.81%

Only in XTR

505 securities, 99.9% of XTR by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp8.11%
  • Apple Inc7.37%
  • Microsoft Corp5.95%

Weight gaps

JULC and XTR share no securities.

All JULC holdings⁠All 503 XTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JULC vs XTR Cost

Overpaying JULC vs XTR

$990

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JULC 0.30%

    $6,149

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JULC 0.30%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530JULC $6,149XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearJULCXTROverpaying
10$545$455$90
20$2,113$1,769$344
30$6,149$5,159$990

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%JULC
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

JULC 2nd cheapest of 77 funds

JULC vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JULC No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
JULC None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
JULC No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
JULC No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
JULC No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
JULC No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

JULCAll JULC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

JULC vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JULC No dataXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JULC No dataXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JULC No dataXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JULC 0.00XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • JULCCvsZALTA

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULCCvsAUGPB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULCCvsTENJB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.