Skip to content

JULT vs XTR

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF

JULTBCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.49pt a year

JULT0.74%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

JULT 8.0×the volume

JULT13.1KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

JULT +2.0pt

JULT+10.9%XTR+8.9%

JULT vs XTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+68.1%JULT+53.3%XTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. JULT +68.1%. XTR +53.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
JULT 0.74%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
JULT $58M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
JULT +9.6%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
JULT 0.00%
XTR 16.45%, better
Holdings
JULT 2
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
JULT 13.1K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
JULT $49.13
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JULT: Cost 68, Risk 46, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 55, Durability 60. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for JULT, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJULTXTR
Cost30% weightB68A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC46HigherF18
Tradability15% weightC48HigherF13
Holdings10% weightB55A85Higher
Durability5% weightB60HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JULT and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

JULT ranks 21st and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 21BEALTInnovator U.S. Equity 5 to 15 Buffer ETFScore 57
  2. Rank 21BJULTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETFScore 57
  3. Rank 23BBOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 56
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JULTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

JULT A 10% cushion on an S&P 500 tracker, reset every July 1. JULT trades unlimited upside for a defined buffer across each 12-month window, and it has been running that trade since 2020 at a fee below the shallow-buffer norm.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

JULT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price returns at the end of the Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses in that underlying ETF.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • JULT The deal is written down in advance: match the S&P 500 tracker's share-price return to June 30, absorb the first 10% of its losses, and give up upside above a cap.
  • 0.74% a year prices under the median fund in its shallow-buffer group and under 0.79% July rivals such as BJUL.
  • Live since June 2020, so it has already rolled through multiple full July-to-June outcome periods instead of asking you to trust a fresh launch.
  • Measured against dozens of dated shallow-buffer funds on the same reference, it lands among the stronger implementations in the group.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • JULT The cap is what pays for the cushion. Upside is capped, and the new level is struck from option pricing each July 1, so it differs from period to period.
  • Protection stops at 10%: losses beyond that pass through. The reference is share-price return, so tracker dividends are not part of the payoff.
  • Trading is thin next to the largest buffer ETFs, so bid-ask spreads weigh more, and buying mid-period means different terms than the stated cap and buffer.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full JULT profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

JULT vs XTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JULT vs XTR Cost

Overpaying JULT vs XTR

$9,148

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JULT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JULT 0.74%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JULT $14,307XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearJULTXTROverpaying
10$1,319$455$864
20$5,015$1,769$3,246
30$14,307$5,159$9,148

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JULT
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

JULT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

JULT vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
JULT 0.00%
XTR 16.45%, better
Payout (12M)
JULT None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
JULT No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
JULT No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
JULT No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
JULT No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

JULT1 paymentAll JULT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2020 $1.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD
XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD

JULT vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • JULT
  • XTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JULT 7.9%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JULT 1.46, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JULT −13.6%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JULT 0.62XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • JULTBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JULTBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.