PSFD ranks 3rd and JULW 12th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
JULW vs PSFD
PSFD −0.25pt a year
0.74%0.49%
JULW 26.1×the volume
23.6K905
PSFD +2.3pt
+8.9%+11.2%
JULW vs PSFD Performance
+53.0%+70.2%
- JULW 0.74%
- PSFD 0.49%, better
- JULW $254M
- PSFD $60M
- JULW +7.0%
- PSFD +11.1%, better
- JULW 0.00%
- PSFD
- JULW 2
- PSFD 4
- JULW 23.6K sh, better
- PSFD 905 sh
- JULW $41.45
- PSFD $40.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULW | PSFD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C49Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | A77Higher | B68 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. JULW and PSFD are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULWC
PSFDB
In short
JULW JULW has held the July slot in AllianzIM's monthly buffer ladder since 2020: it aims to absorb the first 20% of S&P 500 price index losses over each 12-month outcome period, with upside capped in exchange.
PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.
Stated mandate
JULW The Fund pursues a buffered outcome strategy intended to match the returns of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It seeks to protect the first 20% of index losses during the outcome period, while gains are limited by a cap.
PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULW vs PSFD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULW vs PSFD Cost
Overpaying JULW vs PSFD
$4,515
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULW 0.74%
$14,307
PSFD 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULW | PSFD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $883 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,394 | $1,621 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $9,792 | $4,515 |
- 0.74%JULW
- 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
PSFD cheapest of 24 funds
JULW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
JULW vs PSFD Dividends
- JULW 0.00%
- PSFD
- JULW None
- PSFD None
Distribution history
JULW vs PSFD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JULW
- PSFD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULW 5.4%, betterPSFD 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULW 1.41PSFD 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- JULW −9.5%, betterPSFD −14.9%
- Market sensitivity
- JULW 0.38PSFD 0.56
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.