XTR ranks 57th and JULZ 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
JULZ vs XTR
XTR −0.54pt a year
0.79%0.25%
JULZ 2.6×the volume
4.27K1.64K
JULZ +0.8pt
+9.6%+8.8%
JULZ vs XTR Performance
+58.4%+52.2%
- JULZ 0.79%
- XTR 0.25%, better
- JULZ $38M
- XTR $5M
- JULZ +7.6%, better
- XTR +7.5%
- JULZ 11.07%
- XTR 16.51%, better
- JULZ 9
- XTR 505
- JULZ 4.27K sh, better
- XTR 1.64K sh
- JULZ $45.66
- XTR $28.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULZ | XTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24Higher | F18 |
| Tradability | C48Higher | F13 |
| Holdings | A85 | |
| Durability | C52Higher | C46 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. JULZ and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULZD
XTRC
In short
JULZ The buffer ETF that skips the ceiling. JULZ buffers the first 8% to 12% of a 12-month drop in the S&P 500 price index with no cap on the upside, the format TrueShares pioneered in 2020.
XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.
Stated mandate
JULZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while seeking to buffer the first 8%–12% of index losses over each 12-month period.
XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULZ vs XTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULZ vs XTR Cost
Overpaying JULZ vs XTR
$10,015
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULZ 0.79%
$15,174
XTR 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULZ | XTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $455 | $950 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $1,769 | $3,562 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $5,159 | $10,015 |
- 0.79%JULZ
- 0.25%XTR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
XTR cheapest of 77 funds
JULZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
JULZ vs XTR Dividends
- JULZ 11.07%
- XTR 16.51%, better
- JULZ $5.04
- XTR $4.69
- JULZ $5.04
- XTR $0.08
- JULZ Dec 24, 2025
- XTR Jun 29, 2026
- JULZ Dec 26, 2025
- XTR Jul 2, 2026
- JULZ Annual
- XTR Twice a year
Distribution history
JULZ vs XTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JULZ
- XTR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULZ 10.1%, betterXTR 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULZ 1.15XTR 1.19, better
- Worst fall
- JULZ −14.7%, betterXTR −20.8%
- Market sensitivity
- JULZ 0.80XTR 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.