Skip to content

JUNW vs PSFD

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF

JUNWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFDBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFD −0.25pt a year

JUNW0.74%PSFD0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

JUNW 34.1×the volume

JUNW30.9KPSFD905

3Y return · a year

PSFD +4.7pt

JUNW+10.5%PSFD+15.2%

JUNW vs PSFD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+5.3%JUNW+11.1%PSFD

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. JUNW +5.3%. PSFD +11.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%7.5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
JUNW 0.74%
PSFD 0.49%, better
Fund size
JUNW $378M
PSFD $60M
1Y total return
JUNW +5.3%
PSFD +11.1%, better
Holdings
JUNW 2
PSFD 4
Avg volume (30D)
JUNW 30.9K sh, better
PSFD 905 sh
NAV per share
JUNW $34.84
PSFD $40.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

JUNW: Cost 37, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 71, Durability 58. PSFD: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for JUNW, PSFD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarJUNWPSFD
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC48HigherD30
Tradability15% weightB59HigherC45
Holdings10% weightA71Not scored
Durability5% weightB58B68Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. JUNW and PSFD are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFD ranks 3rd and JUNW 13th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 3BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 13CJUNWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETFScore 49
  7. Rank 14CDECWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Dec ETFScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

JUNWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF

PSFDBPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

In short

JUNW JUNW is the June rung in AllianzIM's ladder of deep-buffer funds: it aims to match the one-year share-price return of the S&P 500's biggest ETF, absorbing the first 20% of losses in exchange for a capped upside.

PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.

Stated mandate

JUNW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust's share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and protection against the first 20% of losses.

PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • JUNW Deep by design: the structure is built to absorb the first 20% of a one-year decline in the reference ETF, with an upside cap set at the start of each period as the trade-off.
  • Fixed calendar: the June series runs June 1 through May 31, so the terms are published up front and reset on the same schedule every year.
  • One rung of a full ladder: AllianzIM runs the same 20% buffer with other start months (JANW, APRW, MAYW, AUGW, DECW), so this is a repeatable sleeve rather than a one-off.
  • The reference point is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, a price you can watch trade, not a bespoke index calculated somewhere out of view.
  • PSFD 0.49% a year versus a 0.74% median for 20%-buffer S&P 500 funds, undercutting the AllianzIM month-series lineup (JANW, APRW, JUNW). When upside is capped, fees come straight out of the ceiling.
  • Deep cushion, clean reset: FLEX options are structured to absorb the first 20% of underlying losses over the roughly one-year period, with a new cap struck at the start of each period.paceretfs.com
  • Siblings run the same recipe on other calendars (PSFM in April, PSFJ in July), so start dates can be staggered instead of pinned to one January strike. Standing sits in the upper half of the deep-buffer group.

Worth knowing

  • JUNW 0.74% a year is mid-pack for deep-buffer funds; cheaper builds of the same idea exist, including PBFR at 0.50% and Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds at 0.49%.
  • The payoff tracks share-price return only, so dividends from the underlying sit outside the deal, and gains stop at the cap.
  • Come in mid-period and you inherit a different cap and less remaining cushion; the math is engineered to land at the outcome period's end.
  • PSFD Thinly traded. Spreads can be wider and larger orders harder to fill than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • No income stream: the fund holds options on an S&P 500 tracker rather than the stocks, and it has not paid a distribution.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap run start to finish of the period and are set before fees and expenses. Shares bought mid-period carry different remaining cushion and headroom.paceretfs.com

Full JUNW profile⁠

Full PSFD profile⁠

JUNW vs PSFD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

JUNW vs PSFD Cost

Overpaying JUNW vs PSFD

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • JUNW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFD 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • JUNW 0.74%
  • PSFD 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530JUNW $14,307PSFD $9,792

Year by year

YearJUNWPSFDOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%JUNW
  • 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFD cheapest of 24 funds

JUNW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

JUNW vs PSFD Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
JUNW None
PSFD None

Distribution history

JUNWAll JUNW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFDAll PSFD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JUNW vs PSFD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
JUNW 4.9%, betterPSFD 7.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
JUNW 1.29PSFD 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
JUNW −8.5%since Jun 2023PSFD −14.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
JUNW 0.33PSFD 0.56

Popular comparisons

  • JUNWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUNWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jun ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.