KAPR ranks 4th and KJUL 6th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.
KAPR vs KJUL
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
KJUL 3.3×the volume
17.2K57.2K
KAPR +2.9pt
+6.5%+3.6%
KAPR vs KJUL Performance
+37.0%+19.1%
- KAPR 0.79%
- KJUL 0.79%
- KAPR $180M
- KJUL $223M
- KAPR +13.1%, better
- KJUL +4.2%
- KAPR 3
- KJUL 3
- KAPR 17.2K sh
- KJUL 57.2K sh, better
- KAPR $40.07
- KJUL $33.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KAPR | KJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | C40 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | B57 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A84Higher | A83 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. KAPR and KJUL are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KAPRC
KJULC
In short
KAPR Small caps are the bumpiest ride in US equities. KAPR straps a cushion to them: it tracks the Russell 2000 ETF across an April-to-March outcome period, absorbing the first 15% of losses in exchange for a ceiling on the upside.
KJUL Buffer funds mostly wrap the S&P 500. KJUL wraps small caps: it tracks IWM up to a cap reset each July, with the first 15% of losses over the outcome period absorbed for you. Live since 2020.
Stated mandate
KAPR The fund seeks to follow the return of IWM up to a predetermined cap while protecting investors from the first 15% of losses during the outcome period, before fees and expenses.
KJUL The Fund seeks to match the return of its underlying ETF up to a stated cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KAPR vs KJUL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KAPR vs KJUL Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KAPR 0.79%
$15,174
KJUL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KAPR | KJUL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%KAPR
- 0.79%KJUL
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.77%
KAPR 8th cheapest of 14 funds
KJUL 8th cheapest of 14 funds
KAPR vs KJUL Dividends
- KAPR None
- KJUL None
Distribution history
KAPR vs KJUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KAPR
- KJUL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KAPR 10.2%KJUL 9.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KAPR 1.03, betterKJUL 0.69
- Worst fall
- KAPR −16.9%KJUL −16.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KAPR 0.61KJUL 0.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.