QBKF ranks 1st and KJUL 6th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.
KJUL vs QBKF
QBKF −0.05pt a year
0.79%0.74%
KJUL 33.2×the volume
57.2K1.72K
KJUL vs QBKF Performance
−4.8%−0.8%
- KJUL 0.79%
- QBKF 0.74%, better
- KJUL $223M
- QBKF $9M
- KJUL +4.2%
- QBKF
- KJUL 3
- QBKF 3
- KJUL 57.2K sh, better
- QBKF 1.72K sh
- KJUL $33.35
- QBKF $26.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KJUL | QBKF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A73Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | A88Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | B56 | |
| Durability | A83Higher | D25 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. KJUL and QBKF are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KJULC
QBKFB
In short
KJUL Buffer funds mostly wrap the S&P 500. KJUL wraps small caps: it tracks IWM up to a cap reset each July, with the first 15% of losses over the outcome period absorbed for you. Live since 2020.
Stated mandate
KJUL The Fund seeks to match the return of its underlying ETF up to a stated cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KJUL vs QBKF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KJUL vs QBKF Cost
Overpaying KJUL vs QBKF
$867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KJUL 0.79%
$15,174
QBKF 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KJUL | QBKF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,319 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,015 | $316 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $14,307 | $867 |
- 0.79%KJUL
- 0.74%QBKF, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.77%
QBKF 6th cheapest of 14 funds
KJUL 8th cheapest of 14 funds
KJUL vs QBKF Dividends
- KJUL None
- QBKF None
Distribution history
KJUL vs QBKF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KJUL 9.3%QBKF
- Return per unit of risk
- KJUL 0.69QBKF
- Worst fall
- KJUL −16.7%QBKF
- Market sensitivity
- KJUL 0.59QBKF 0.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.