Skip to content

KJUL vs QBKF

Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July

KJULCCboe

Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

QBKFBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QBKF −0.05pt a year

KJUL0.79%QBKF0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

KJUL 33.2×the volume

KJUL57.2KQBKF1.72K

KJUL vs QBKF Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−4.8%KJUL−0.8%QBKF

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. KJUL −4.8%. QBKF −0.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−3%−2%0%1%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
KJUL 0.79%
QBKF 0.74%, better
Fund size
KJUL $223M
QBKF $9M
1Y total return
KJUL +4.2%
QBKF No data
Holdings
KJUL 3
QBKF 3
Avg volume (30D)
KJUL 57.2K sh, better
QBKF 1.72K sh
NAV per share
KJUL $33.35
QBKF $26.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KJUL: Cost 40, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings not scored, Durability 83. QBKF: Cost 73, Risk 88, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 56, Durability 25.
Pillar letters and Scores for KJUL, QBKF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKJULQBKF
Cost30% weightC40A73Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC43A88Higher
Tradability15% weightB68HigherD38
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB56
Durability5% weightA83HigherD25

Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KJUL and QBKF are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Russell 2000 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

QBKF ranks 1st and KJUL 6th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBKFAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BQBKVAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 5CKJANInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 51
  4. Rank 6CKJULInnovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 50
  5. Rank 7CRBProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KJULCInnovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July

QBKFBAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

In short

KJUL Buffer funds mostly wrap the S&P 500. KJUL wraps small caps: it tracks IWM up to a cap reset each July, with the first 15% of losses over the outcome period absorbed for you. Live since 2020.

QBKF No data

Stated mandate

KJUL The Fund seeks to match the return of its underlying ETF up to a stated cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.

QBKF No data

Why people hold it

  • KJUL Small-cap downside cushioning is a thin niche. KJUL buffers the first 15% of IWM's losses over a one-year outcome period, in a plain 1940 Act ETF wrapper.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79% it matches the going rate for small-cap buffer funds and undercuts the FT Vest alternatives (SMAY, SNOV) at 0.90%.
  • Part of a January/April/July/October series, so entries can be staggered across reset dates rather than pinned to one.innovatoretfs.com
  • Easier to trade than most funds in this thin corner, and one of the stronger implementations in its small-cap buffer group. Running since 2020.

QBKF No data

Worth knowing

  • KJUL Protection stops at 15%. Losses past that come straight through, and the buffer is measured over the outcome period, not any 12 months you happen to hold.innovatoretfs.com
  • The cap resets each July at whatever options pricing allows, so the ceiling shifts yearly. Buy mid-period and you get the remaining buffer and cap, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79% it costs many times a plain small-cap index fund, and it hasn't been an income vehicle: the payoff shows up in price.

QBKF No data

Full KJUL profile⁠

Full QBKF profile⁠

KJUL vs QBKF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KJUL vs QBKF Cost

Overpaying KJUL vs QBKF

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QBKF 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KJUL 0.79%
  • QBKF 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KJUL $15,174QBKF $14,307

Year by year

YearKJULQBKFOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%KJUL
  • 0.74%QBKF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.77%

QBKF 6th cheapest of 14 funds

KJUL 8th cheapest of 14 funds

KJUL vs QBKF Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
KJUL None
QBKF None

Distribution history

KJULAll KJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBKFAll QBKF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

KJUL vs QBKF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KJUL 9.3%QBKF No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KJUL 0.69QBKF No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KJUL −16.7%QBKF No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KJUL 0.59QBKF 0.12

Popular comparisons

  • KJULCvsQBKVB

    Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBKFBvsQBKVB

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KJULCvsKOCTB

    Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBKFBvsKOCTB

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KJULCvsKAPRC

    Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBKFBvsKAPRC

    Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.