KOCT ranks 3rd and KJUL 6th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.
KJUL vs KOCT
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
KJUL 2.0×the volume
57.2K29.1K
KOCT +2.2pt
+3.6%+5.8%
KJUL vs KOCT Performance
+19.1%+32.7%
- KJUL 0.79%
- KOCT 0.79%
- KJUL $223M
- KOCT $173M
- KJUL +4.2%
- KOCT +12.4%, better
- KJUL
- KOCT 0.00%
- KJUL 3
- KOCT 3
- KJUL 57.2K sh, better
- KOCT 29.1K sh
- KJUL $33.35
- KOCT $38.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KJUL | KOCT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | C40 |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | C43 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | B68 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A83 | A87Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. KJUL and KOCT are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KJULC
KOCTB
In short
KJUL Buffer funds mostly wrap the S&P 500. KJUL wraps small caps: it tracks IWM up to a cap reset each July, with the first 15% of losses over the outcome period absorbed for you. Live since 2020.
KOCT Small-cap exposure with a seatbelt. KOCT tracks IWM up to a yearly cap while absorbing the first 15% of losses, resetting each October 1. A 2019 original in a corner where most buffer funds are built on the S&P 500.
Stated mandate
KJUL The Fund seeks to match the return of its underlying ETF up to a stated cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.
KOCT The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KJUL vs KOCT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KJUL vs KOCT Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KJUL 0.79%
$15,174
KOCT 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KJUL | KOCT |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%KJUL
- 0.79%KOCT
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.77%
KJUL 8th cheapest of 14 funds
KOCT 8th cheapest of 14 funds
KJUL vs KOCT Dividends
- KJUL
- KOCT 0.00%
- KJUL None
- KOCT None
Distribution history
KJUL vs KOCT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KJUL
- KOCT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KJUL 9.3%KOCT 8.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KJUL 0.69KOCT 1.17, better
- Worst fall
- KJUL −16.7%KOCT −16.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KJUL 0.59KOCT 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.