Skip to content

KJUL vs KOCT

Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July

KJULCCboe

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

KOCTBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

KJUL0.79%KOCT0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

KJUL 2.0×the volume

KJUL57.2KKOCT29.1K

5Y return · a year

KOCT +2.2pt

KJUL+3.6%KOCT+5.8%

KJUL vs KOCT Performance

Nov 5, 2021 – Nov 5, 2026

+19.1%KJUL+32.7%KOCT

Nov 5, 2021 to Nov 5, 2026. KJUL +19.1%. KOCT +32.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
KJUL 0.79%
KOCT 0.79%
Fund size
KJUL $223M
KOCT $173M
1Y total return
KJUL +4.2%
KOCT +12.4%, better
Yield (12M)
KJUL No data
KOCT 0.00%
Holdings
KJUL 3
KOCT 3
Avg volume (30D)
KJUL 57.2K sh, better
KOCT 29.1K sh
NAV per share
KJUL $33.35
KOCT $38.24
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KJUL: Cost 40, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings not scored, Durability 83. KOCT: Cost 40, Risk 59, Mission 89, Tradability 81, Holdings not scored, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for KJUL, KOCT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKJULKOCT
Cost30% weightC40C40
Mission25% weightNot scoredA89
Risk15% weightC43B59Higher
Tradability15% weightB68A81Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA83A87Higher

Rank among Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KJUL and KOCT are both graded against the same 14 Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Russell 2000 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

KOCT ranks 3rd and KJUL 6th of 14 funds in the Russell 2000 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBKFAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BQBKVAllianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BKOCTInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4CKAPRInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - AprilScore 52
  5. Rank 5CKJANInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 51
  6. Rank 6CKJULInnovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 50
  7. Rank 7CRBProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KJULCInnovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July

KOCTBInnovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF

In short

KJUL Buffer funds mostly wrap the S&P 500. KJUL wraps small caps: it tracks IWM up to a cap reset each July, with the first 15% of losses over the outcome period absorbed for you. Live since 2020.

KOCT Small-cap exposure with a seatbelt. KOCT tracks IWM up to a yearly cap while absorbing the first 15% of losses, resetting each October 1. A 2019 original in a corner where most buffer funds are built on the S&P 500.

Stated mandate

KJUL The Fund seeks to match the return of its underlying ETF up to a stated cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.

KOCT The Fund seeks to track the return of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • KJUL Small-cap downside cushioning is a thin niche. KJUL buffers the first 15% of IWM's losses over a one-year outcome period, in a plain 1940 Act ETF wrapper.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79% it matches the going rate for small-cap buffer funds and undercuts the FT Vest alternatives (SMAY, SNOV) at 0.90%.
  • Part of a January/April/July/October series, so entries can be staggered across reset dates rather than pinned to one.innovatoretfs.com
  • Easier to trade than most funds in this thin corner, and one of the stronger implementations in its small-cap buffer group. Running since 2020.
  • KOCT The contract is plain: track the iShares Russell 2000 ETF up to a preset cap, with the first 15% of losses over the one-year outcome period absorbed first.innovatoretfs.com
  • Rare air: it listed October 1, 2019 in Innovator's first small-cap buffer wave. Most defined-outcome ETFs wrap the S&P 500, not the Russell 2000.accessnewswire.com
  • Fee lands at 0.79%, the middle of its small-cap buffer group, and the fund rates in the upper half of that group on our review.
  • You pick your calendar. This is the October reset; siblings KJAN, KAPR and KJUL run the same 15% buffer off other quarters.

Worth knowing

  • KJUL Protection stops at 15%. Losses past that come straight through, and the buffer is measured over the outcome period, not any 12 months you happen to hold.innovatoretfs.com
  • The cap resets each July at whatever options pricing allows, so the ceiling shifts yearly. Buy mid-period and you get the remaining buffer and cap, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79% it costs many times a plain small-cap index fund, and it hasn't been an income vehicle: the payoff shows up in price.
  • KOCT The cap is the price of the cushion. A blistering small-cap year gets trimmed, and the cap is reset for each new outcome period starting October 1.
  • Timing matters: Innovator notes the stated outcomes apply to holders from the first day of the outcome period through the last. Buy mid-period and your own cap and buffer differ.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trading is light versus mainstream small-cap funds, and the options-based structure isn't built to throw off income.

Full KJUL profile⁠

Full KOCT profile⁠

KJUL vs KOCT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KJUL vs KOCT Cost

Same expense ratio

$15,174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • KOCT 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KJUL 0.79%
  • KOCT 0.79%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530KJUL $15,174KOCT $15,174

Year by year

YearKJULKOCT
10$1,405$1,405
20$5,331$5,331
30$15,174$15,174

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%KJUL
  • 0.79%KOCT
  • Middle half of Russell 2000 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.77%

KJUL 8th cheapest of 14 funds

KOCT 8th cheapest of 14 funds

KJUL vs KOCT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
KJUL No data
KOCT 0.00%
Payout (12M)
KJUL None
KOCT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

KJULAll KJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

KOCT1 paymentAll KOCT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202019

KJUL vs KOCT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KJUL
  • KOCT
Nov 5, 2021 to Nov 5, 2026. Worst fall: KJUL −16.7% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KJUL 9.3%KOCT 8.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KJUL 0.69KOCT 1.17, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KJUL −16.7%KOCT −16.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KJUL 0.59KOCT 0.63

Popular comparisons

  • KJULCvsQBKFB

    Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOCTBvsQBKFB

    Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KJULCvsQBKVB

    Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOCTBvsQBKVB

    Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF · Allianzim U.S. Small Cap Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KJULCvsKAPRC

    Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KOCTBvsKAPRC

    Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.