KBFR ranks 1st and RSJN 4th of 9 funds in the Other Buffered Category.
KBFR vs RSJN
KBFR −0.06pt a year
0.79%0.85%
RSJN 8.7×the volume
3.25K28.4K
KBFR vs RSJN Performance
−0.8%+1.9%
- KBFR 0.79%, better
- RSJN 0.85%
- KBFR $13M
- RSJN $86M
- KBFR
- RSJN +13.5%
- KBFR 833
- RSJN 3
- KBFR 3.25K sh
- RSJN 28.4K sh, better
- KBFR $26.76
- RSJN $38.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KBFR | RSJN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A75Higher | D39 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | B57 |
| Durability | C48 | A84Higher |
Rank among Other Buffered funds
Same Category. KBFR and RSJN are both graded against the same 9 Other Buffered funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KBFRB
RSJNB
In short
KBFR Small caps with a seatbelt. Innovator's actively managed fund owns roughly 800 U.S. small caps and layers options on top, built around the 10% buffer in its name, and it undercuts the typical buffer fund on fee.
RSJN Most buffer ETFs are bolted onto the cap-weighted S&P 500, where a few megacaps call the shots. RSJN buffers the equal-weight version instead: the same 500-odd names, spread evenly, with the first 10% of losses absorbed over each June-to-June period.
Stated mandate
KBFR The Fund seeks long-term capital gains while mitigating overall market risk. It is actively managed and uses equity and option positions to provide risk-managed U.S. small-cap exposure.
RSJN Seeks returns matching the Underlying ETF’s price return up to a predetermined cap, while buffering the first 10% of its losses during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 Target Outcome Period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KBFR vs RSJN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KBFR vs RSJN Cost
Overpaying RSJN vs KBFR
$1,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KBFR 0.79%
$15,174
RSJN 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KBFR | RSJN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,508 | $103 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,706 | $375 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $16,199 | $1,025 |
- 0.79%KBFR, cheaper
- 0.85%RSJN
- Middle half of Other Buffered funds
- Median 0.85%
KBFR cheapest of 9 funds
RSJN 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
KBFR vs RSJN Dividends
- KBFR
- RSJN None
- KBFR $0.04
- RSJN
- KBFR Sep 30, 2026
- RSJN
- KBFR Oct 2, 2026
- RSJN
- KBFR Quarterly
- RSJN
Distribution history
KBFR vs RSJN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KBFR RSJN 7.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- KBFR RSJN 0.84
- Worst fall
- KBFR RSJN −12.4%
- Market sensitivity
- KBFR 0.24RSJN 0.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.