XLF ranks 1st and KBWP 8th of 18 funds in the Financials (Broad) Category.
KBWP vs XLF
XLF −0.27pt a year
0.35%0.08%
XLF 1869.0×the volume
18K33.7M
KBWP +0.2pt
+13.0%+12.8%
KBWP vs XLF Performance
+94.9%+57.8%
- KBWP 0.35%
- XLF 0.08%, better
- KBWP $305M
- XLF $53.4B
- KBWP +18.2%, better
- XLF +11.6%
- KBWP 1.75%, better
- XLF 1.42%
- KBWP 26
- XLF 79
- KBWP 18K sh
- XLF 33.7M sh, better
- KBWP $139.74
- XLF $57.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KBWP | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A85Higher |
| Risk | B61Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | D33 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | C42Higher |
| Durability | D39 | A81Higher |
Rank among Financials (Broad) funds
Same Category. KBWP and XLF are both graded against the same 18 Financials (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KBWPB
XLFA
In short
KBWP Financials without the banks. KBWP holds a tight basket of property and casualty insurers, the companies that price hurricanes and fender-benders, tracking the KBW Nasdaq P&C index since 2010.
XLF The 1998 original. XLF holds the S&P 500's financial sector, roughly 80 banks, insurers, card networks and exchanges, for 0.08% a year. Not the whole sector, the blue-chip end of it, and one of the most heavily traded ways to own it.
Stated mandate
KBWP The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of its underlying index by investing primarily in securities that comprise that index.
XLF The fund seeks to track, before expenses, the price and yield performance of the Financial Select Sector Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KBWP vs XLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KBWP vs XLF Cost
Overpaying KBWP vs XLF
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KBWP 0.35%
$7,126
XLF 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KBWP | XLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $147 | $487 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $575 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,689 | $5,437 |
- 0.35%KBWP
- 0.08%XLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Financials (Broad) funds
- Median 0.37%
XLF cheapest of 18 funds
KBWP 5th cheapest of 18 funds
KBWP vs XLF Dividends
- KBWP 1.75%, better
- XLF 1.42%
- KBWP $2.45
- XLF $0.83
- KBWP $0.36
- XLF $0.20
- KBWP Sep 21, 2026
- XLF Sep 21, 2026
- KBWP Sep 25, 2026
- XLF Sep 23, 2026
- KBWP Quarterly
- XLF Quarterly
Distribution history
KBWP vs XLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KBWP
- XLF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KBWP 18.6%XLF 15.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KBWP 0.77XLF 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- KBWP −17.0%, betterXLF −25.8%
- Market sensitivity
- KBWP 0.21XLF 0.75
KBWP and XLF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





