QAI ranks 3rd and LALT 9th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
LALT vs QAI
QAI −0.37pt a year
1.18%0.81%
LALT 2.3×the volume
133K58.2K
LALT +1.5pt
+10.2%+8.7%
LALT vs QAI Performance
+10.8%+7.5%
- LALT 1.18%
- QAI 0.81%, better
- LALT $446M
- QAI $985M
- LALT +10.8%, better
- QAI +7.5%
- LALT 4.03%, better
- QAI 1.41%
- LALT 8
- QAI 66
- LALT 133K sh, better
- QAI 58.2K sh
- LALT $24.35
- QAI $35.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LALT | QAI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A82Higher | A71 |
| Tradability | A70 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | D27 | C45Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A84Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. LALT and QAI are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LALTB
QAIA
In short
LALT Most funds in this corner run one playbook: trend. LALT is the sampler plate, an actively managed mix of alternative strategies from First Trust, built to move differently from stocks and bonds. The variety costs extra.
QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).
Stated mandate
LALT The Fund seeks long-term total return through active allocation among alternative asset categories and strategies intended to provide diversification and lower correlation with traditional equity and fixed-income benchmarks.
QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LALT vs QAI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LALT vs QAI Cost
Overpaying LALT vs QAI
$6,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LALT 1.18%
$21,543
QAI 0.81%
$15,518
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LALT | QAI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,065 | $1,439 | $626 |
| 20 | $7,697 | $5,456 | $2,241 |
| 30 | $21,543 | $15,518 | $6,025 |
- 1.18%LALT
- 0.81%QAI, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds
LALT 16th cheapest of 29 funds
LALT vs QAI Dividends
- LALT 4.03%, better
- QAI 1.41%
- LALT $0.98
- QAI $0.50
- LALT $0.08
- QAI $0.50
- LALT Sep 24, 2026
- QAI Dec 30, 2025
- LALT Sep 30, 2026
- QAI Jan 5, 2026
- LALT Quarterly
- QAI Annual
Distribution history
LALT vs QAI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LALT 4.8%, betterQAI 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LALT 1.23, betterQAI 0.81
- Worst fall
- LALT −7.0%QAI −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- LALT 0.15QAI 0.36
LALT and QAI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.18% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

