QALT ranks 4th and LALT 9th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
LALT vs QALT
QALT −0.38pt a year
1.18%0.80%
LALT 7.5×the volume
133K17.7K
LALT vs QALT Performance
+10.8%+6.9%
- LALT 1.18%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- LALT $446M
- QALT $194M
- LALT +10.8%, better
- QALT +6.9%
- LALT 4.03%
- QALT
- LALT 8
- QALT 27
- LALT 133K sh, better
- QALT 17.7K sh
- LALT $24.35
- QALT $25.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LALT | QALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A82Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | D27 | |
| Durability | A75Higher | B64 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. LALT and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LALTB
QALTA
In short
LALT Most funds in this corner run one playbook: trend. LALT is the sampler plate, an actively managed mix of alternative strategies from First Trust, built to move differently from stocks and bonds. The variety costs extra.
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
Stated mandate
LALT The Fund seeks long-term total return through active allocation among alternative asset categories and strategies intended to provide diversification and lower correlation with traditional equity and fixed-income benchmarks.
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LALT vs QALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LALT vs QALT Cost
Overpaying LALT vs QALT
$6,197
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LALT 1.18%
$21,543
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LALT | QALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,065 | $1,422 | $643 |
| 20 | $7,697 | $5,393 | $2,304 |
| 30 | $21,543 | $15,346 | $6,197 |
- 1.18%LALT
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
LALT 16th cheapest of 29 funds
LALT vs QALT Dividends
- LALT 4.03%
- QALT
- LALT $0.98
- QALT
- LALT $0.08
- QALT $0.17
- LALT Sep 24, 2026
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- LALT Sep 30, 2026
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- LALT Quarterly
- QALT Quarterly
Distribution history
LALT vs QALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LALT 4.8%QALT 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LALT 1.23QALT 0.77
- Worst fall
- LALT −7.0%QALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- LALT 0.15QALT 0.24
LALT and QALT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.18% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

