QAI ranks 3rd and LBAY 20th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
LBAY vs QAI
QAI −0.39pt a year
1.20%0.81%
QAI 31.4×the volume
1.85K58.2K
LBAY +3.3pt
+7.3%+4.0%
LBAY vs QAI Performance
+42.5%+21.8%
- LBAY 1.20%
- QAI 0.81%, better
- LBAY $19M
- QAI $985M
- LBAY +24.2%, better
- QAI +7.5%
- LBAY 3.54%, better
- QAI 1.41%
- LBAY 36
- QAI 66
- LBAY 1.85K sh
- QAI 58.2K sh, better
- LBAY $28.54
- QAI $35.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LBAY | QAI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | C48Higher | C45 |
| Durability | C45 | A84Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. LBAY and QAI are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LBAYC
QAIA
In short
LBAY A hedge-fund playbook in ETF clothing: long the companies returning cash through dividends, buybacks and debt paydowns, short the single names it thinks are broken, net long throughout, 1.20% a year, paid monthly.
QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).
Stated mandate
LBAY The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income through an actively managed long/short equity strategy.
QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LBAY vs QAI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LBAY vs QAI Cost
Overpaying LBAY vs QAI
$6,333
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LBAY 1.20%
$21,851
QAI 0.81%
$15,518
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LBAY | QAI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,098 | $1,439 | $659 |
| 20 | $7,814 | $5,456 | $2,358 |
| 30 | $21,851 | $15,518 | $6,333 |
- 1.20%LBAY
- 0.81%QAI, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds
LBAY 17th cheapest of 29 funds
LBAY vs QAI Dividends
- LBAY 3.54%, better
- QAI 1.41%
- LBAY $1.01
- QAI $0.50
- LBAY $0.09
- QAI $0.50
- LBAY Oct 29, 2026
- QAI Dec 30, 2025
- LBAY Oct 30, 2026
- QAI Jan 5, 2026
- LBAY Monthly
- QAI Annual
Distribution history
LBAY vs QAI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LBAY
- QAI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LBAY 16.5%QAI 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LBAY 0.22QAI 0.81, better
- Worst fall
- LBAY −16.0%QAI −14.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LBAY 0.06QAI 0.36
LBAY and QAI in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 1.20% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.20% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.20% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.