QALT ranks 4th and LBAY 20th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
LBAY vs QALT
QALT −0.40pt a year
1.20%0.80%
QALT 9.6×the volume
1.85K17.7K
LBAY vs QALT Performance
+24.2%+6.9%
- LBAY 1.20%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- LBAY $19M
- QALT $194M
- LBAY +24.2%, better
- QALT +6.9%
- LBAY 3.54%
- QALT
- LBAY 36
- QALT 27
- LBAY 1.85K sh
- QALT 17.7K sh, better
- LBAY $28.54
- QALT $25.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LBAY | QALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | C48 | |
| Durability | C45 | B64Higher |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. LBAY and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LBAYC
QALTA
In short
LBAY A hedge-fund playbook in ETF clothing: long the companies returning cash through dividends, buybacks and debt paydowns, short the single names it thinks are broken, net long throughout, 1.20% a year, paid monthly.
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
Stated mandate
LBAY The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income through an actively managed long/short equity strategy.
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LBAY vs QALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LBAY vs QALT Cost
Overpaying LBAY vs QALT
$6,505
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LBAY 1.20%
$21,851
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LBAY | QALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,098 | $1,422 | $676 |
| 20 | $7,814 | $5,393 | $2,421 |
| 30 | $21,851 | $15,346 | $6,505 |
- 1.20%LBAY
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
LBAY 17th cheapest of 29 funds
LBAY vs QALT Dividends
- LBAY 3.54%
- QALT
- LBAY $1.01
- QALT
- LBAY $0.09
- QALT $0.17
- LBAY Oct 29, 2026
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- LBAY Oct 30, 2026
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- LBAY Monthly
- QALT Quarterly
Distribution history
LBAY vs QALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LBAY 16.5%QALT 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LBAY 0.22QALT 0.77
- Worst fall
- LBAY −16.0%QALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- LBAY 0.06QALT 0.24
Popular comparisons
- 1.20% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.20% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.20% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.