SCYB ranks 1st and LDRH 32nd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
LDRH vs SCYB
SCYB −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SCYB 188.4×the volume
5.86K1.1M
LDRH vs SCYB Performance
+2.2%+2.0%
- LDRH 0.35%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- LDRH $25M
- SCYB $2.8B
- LDRH +2.2%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- LDRH 6.48%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- LDRH 1535
- SCYB 1844
- LDRH 5.86K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- LDRH $24.03
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LDRH | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B61Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | C48 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A99Higher |
| Durability | D32 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. LDRH and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LDRHB
SCYBA
In short
LDRH A whole high-yield bond ladder in one ticker. LDRH tracks an index of iShares iBonds high yield funds that all mature inside six years, and it pays monthly. The DIY version means buying and rolling every rung yourself.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
LDRH The fund seeks to track an index composed of iShares iBonds High Yield and Income ETFs with maturities under six years.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LDRH vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LDRH vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying LDRH vs SCYB
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LDRH 0.35%
$7,126
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LDRH | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%LDRH
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
LDRH 24th cheapest of 84 funds
LDRH vs SCYB Dividends
- LDRH 6.48%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- LDRH $1.56
- SCYB $1.80
- LDRH $0.13
- SCYB $0.16
- LDRH Oct 2, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- LDRH Oct 7, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- LDRH Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
LDRH vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LDRH 2.3%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- LDRH 0.07SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- LDRH −3.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- LDRH 0.13SCYB 0.28
LDRH and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
