SCHZ ranks 2nd and LDSF 93rd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
LDSF vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.84pt a year
0.87%0.03%
SCHZ 82.8×the volume
28.6K2.37M
LDSF +2.7pt
+2.5%−0.2%
LDSF vs SCHZ Performance
+13.1%−1.0%
- LDSF 0.87%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- LDSF $160M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- LDSF +1.8%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- LDSF 4.78%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- LDSF 9
- SCHZ 12610
- LDSF 28.6K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- LDSF $18.56
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LDSF | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | A97Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A84Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C43 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. LDSF and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LDSFC
SCHZA
In short
LDSF A one-ticket bond sleeve kept on a short leash: LDSF blends income ETFs, largely First Trust's own, to an effective duration of three years or less. Current income is the stated goal, capital preservation the backup.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
LDSF The Fund seeks current income and secondarily preservation of capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in U.S.-listed ETFs principally investing in income-generating securities with effective portfolio duration of three years or less.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LDSF vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LDSF vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying LDSF vs SCHZ
$15,898
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LDSF 0.87%
$16,536
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LDSF | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,542 | $55 | $1,487 |
| 20 | $5,830 | $216 | $5,614 |
| 30 | $16,536 | $638 | $15,898 |
- 0.87%LDSF
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
LDSF 111th cheapest of 114 funds
LDSF vs SCHZ Dividends
- LDSF 4.78%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- LDSF $0.89
- SCHZ $0.96
- LDSF $0.08
- SCHZ $0.08
- LDSF Oct 21, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- LDSF Oct 30, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- LDSF Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
LDSF vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LDSF
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LDSF 2.9%, betterSCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- LDSF 0.33, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- LDSF −7.5%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- LDSF 0.47SCHZ 0.99
LDSF and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.87% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.87% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
