SPHY ranks 3rd and LEND 70th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
LEND vs SPHY
SPHY −0.60pt a year
0.65%0.05%
SPHY 78.4×the volume
78K6.12M
LEND vs SPHY Performance
−1.6%−1.1%
- LEND 0.65%
- SPHY 0.05%, better
- LEND $976M
- SPHY $11.9B
- LEND
- SPHY +2.7%
- LEND
- SPHY 7.37%
- LEND 1412
- SPHY 1921
- LEND 78K sh
- SPHY 6.12M sh, better
- LEND $23.99
- SPHY $22.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LEND | SPHY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D26 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A97Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A93Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. LEND and SPHY are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LENDD
SPHYA
In short
LEND A 1995 high yield mutual fund that changed clothes. SEI reorganized its three-decade-old SIMT High Yield Bond Fund into its first fixed income ETF, pairing outside bond managers with an in-house CLO sleeve.
SPHY State Street's junk-bond workhorse: roughly 1,900 US high yield bonds in one wrapper for 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high yield ETF charges, with income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
LEND The Fund seeks total return and normally invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus investment borrowings, in high-yield fixed-income and, to a lesser extent, alternative-credit securities.
SPHY The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE BofA US High Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LEND vs SPHY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LEND vs SPHY Cost
Overpaying LEND vs SPHY
$11,657
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LEND 0.65%
$12,717
SPHY 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LEND | SPHY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $92 | $1,071 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $360 | $4,080 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $1,060 | $11,657 |
- 0.65%LEND
- 0.05%SPHY, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SPHY 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
LEND 73rd cheapest of 84 funds
LEND vs SPHY Dividends
- LEND
- SPHY 7.37%
- LEND
- SPHY $1.67
- LEND $0.15
- SPHY $0.14
- LEND Nov 4, 2026
- SPHY Nov 2, 2026
- LEND Nov 5, 2026
- SPHY Nov 5, 2026
- LEND Monthly
- SPHY Monthly
Distribution history
LEND vs SPHY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LEND SPHY 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- LEND SPHY 0.88
- Worst fall
- LEND SPHY −15.3%
- Market sensitivity
- LEND 0.52SPHY 0.64
LEND and SPHY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





