SCYB ranks 1st and LEND 70th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
LEND vs SCYB
SCYB −0.62pt a year
0.65%0.03%
SCYB 14.6×the volume
78K1.14M
LEND vs SCYB Performance
−1.6%−1.3%
- LEND 0.65%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- LEND $976M
- SCYB $2.73B
- LEND
- SCYB +2.6%
- LEND
- SCYB 7.16%
- LEND 1412
- SCYB 1838
- LEND 78K sh
- SCYB 1.14M sh, better
- LEND $23.99
- SCYB $25.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LEND | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D26 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A73Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. LEND and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LENDD
SCYBA
In short
LEND A 1995 high yield mutual fund that changed clothes. SEI reorganized its three-decade-old SIMT High Yield Bond Fund into its first fixed income ETF, pairing outside bond managers with an in-house CLO sleeve.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
LEND The Fund seeks total return and normally invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus investment borrowings, in high-yield fixed-income and, to a lesser extent, alternative-credit securities.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LEND vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LEND vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying LEND vs SCYB
$12,079
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LEND 0.65%
$12,717
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LEND | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $55 | $1,108 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $216 | $4,224 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $638 | $12,079 |
- 0.65%LEND
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
LEND 73rd cheapest of 84 funds
LEND vs SCYB Dividends
- LEND
- SCYB 7.16%
- LEND
- SCYB $1.81
- LEND $0.15
- SCYB $0.16
- LEND Nov 4, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- LEND Nov 5, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- LEND Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
LEND vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LEND SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- LEND SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- LEND SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- LEND 0.52SCYB 0.28
LEND and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
