Skip to content

LFEQ vs PTLC

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

LFEQBNYSE Arca

Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

PTLCACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

LFEQ −0.02pt a year

LFEQ0.58%PTLC0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTLC 93.1×the volume

LFEQ1.09KPTLC101K

5Y return · a year

PTLC +0.9pt

LFEQ+7.6%PTLC+8.5%

LFEQ vs PTLC Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+44.0%LFEQ+50.2%PTLC

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. LFEQ +44.0%. PTLC +50.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%60%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LFEQ 0.58%, better
PTLC 0.60%
Fund size
LFEQ $26M
PTLC $3.15B
1Y total return
LFEQ +12.5%, better
PTLC +7.6%
Yield (12M)
LFEQ 0.82%
PTLC 1.01%, better
Holdings
LFEQ 2
PTLC 505
Avg volume (30D)
LFEQ 1.09K sh
PTLC 101K sh, better
NAV per share
LFEQ $58.57
PTLC $57.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LFEQ: Cost 79, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings 36, Durability 62. PTLC: Cost 71, Risk 64, Mission 78, Tradability 100, Holdings 71, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for LFEQ, PTLC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLFEQPTLC
Cost30% weightA79HigherA71
Mission25% weightNot scoredA78
Risk15% weightB64B64
Tradability15% weightD34A100Higher
Holdings10% weightD36A71Higher
Durability5% weightB62A86Higher

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LFEQ and PTLC are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

PTLC ranks 2nd and LFEQ 8th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AONOFGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 7BPTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 8BLFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 9BPTINPacer Trendpilot International ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LFEQBVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

PTLCAPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

In short

LFEQ Trend following in an ETF wrapper: LFEQ tracks a Ned Davis Research index that uses daily signals to shift between US large-cap stocks and Treasury bills, trimming equity when the tape weakens. Live since 2017, priced below its peer median.

PTLC Most index funds ride out every drawdown. PTLC tracks an index with an exit ramp: a rules-based trend signal that shifts its large-cap exposure toward 3-month Treasury bills and back, with no manager judgment in the loop.

Stated mandate

LFEQ The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index. The index uses daily signals to vary exposure between U.S. equities and Treasury bills, seeking participation in advances while limiting losses in declines.

PTLC The Fund seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index. That index uses a rules-based trend-following approach that alternates exposure between equities and 3-Month US Treasury bills.

Why people hold it

  • LFEQ 0.58% a year, against a median near 0.95% for tactical multi-asset funds. Rules-based risk management usually costs more than this.
  • The de-risking is mechanical, not discretionary: daily index signals move exposure between US equities and T-bills. No manager's gut call on when to step aside.
  • Trading since 2017, so the signal has run through live markets and real drawdowns rather than a backtest.
  • PTLC The switch is mechanical. A rules-based trend signal alternates exposure between US large-cap equities and 3-month Treasury bills, so nobody is making a gut call mid-panic.paceretfs.com
  • Underneath the signal sits plain large-cap America: roughly 500 stocks benchmarked to the S&P 500, not a niche factor slice.paceretfs.com
  • Trading since 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so the rules have run through live markets, not just backtests.
  • Among the index-tracking funds we cover, it lands in the upper half, and it follows its own index closely.

Worth knowing

  • LFEQ Trend rules follow price, not forecasts. A sharp V-shaped rebound can get underway while the index is still sitting in Treasury bills.
  • It stays a small, thinly traded fund, which typically means wider bid-ask spreads than a mainstream large-cap index ETF.
  • Cheaper than tactical peers TUGN (0.65%) and PWS (0.60%), though ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run leaner.
  • PTLC 0.60% a year is real money next to vanilla large-cap trackers like SCHK (0.03%) or VOOV (0.07%). The trend rules are what the extra buys.
  • Trend signals read past prices. Moves into T-bills, or back into stocks, arrive after a market shift is already underway rather than ahead of it.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, so it isn't structured as a steady income drip.

Full LFEQ profile⁠

Full PTLC profile⁠

LFEQ vs PTLC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LFEQ vs PTLC Cost

Overpaying PTLC vs LFEQ

$364

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LFEQ 0.58%

    $11,453

  • PTLC 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LFEQ 0.58%
  • PTLC 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PTLC $11,817LFEQ $11,453

Year by year

YearLFEQPTLCOverpaying
10$1,041$1,076$35
20$3,986$4,116$130
30$11,453$11,817$364

Expense ratio

  • 0.58%LFEQ, cheaper
  • 0.60%PTLC
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

LFEQ 5th cheapest of 20 funds

PTLC 6th cheapest of 20 funds

LFEQ vs PTLC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
LFEQ 0.82%
PTLC 1.01%, better
Payout (12M)
LFEQ $0.49
PTLC $0.59
Last payment
LFEQ $0.49
PTLC $0.59
Ex-dividend
LFEQ Dec 29, 2025
PTLC Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
LFEQ Dec 31, 2025
PTLC Jan 5, 2026
Frequency
LFEQ Annual
PTLC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LFEQAnnual · 9 paymentsAll LFEQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.26; Dec 23, 2019 $0.43; Dec 29, 2020 $0.71; Dec 29, 2021 $0.16; Dec 28, 2022 $0.41; Dec 27, 2023 $0.63; Dec 27, 2024 $0.36; Dec 29, 2025 $0.49. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
PTLCAnnual · 9 paymentsAll PTLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.28; Dec 24, 2018 $0.29; Dec 24, 2019 $0.37; Dec 21, 2020 $0.35; Dec 23, 2021 $0.31; Dec 22, 2022 $0.47; Dec 27, 2023 $0.51; Dec 27, 2024 $0.36; Dec 30, 2025 $0.59. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

LFEQ vs PTLC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LFEQ
  • PTLC
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: LFEQ −25.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LFEQ 12.0%PTLC 11.7%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LFEQ 1.16, betterPTLC 0.95
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LFEQ −25.5%PTLC −15.2%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LFEQ 0.90PTLC 0.87

LFEQ and PTLC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LFEQBvsWAMAA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsWAMAA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LFEQBvsONOFA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsONOFA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LFEQBvsPTMCA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsPTMCA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.