PTLC ranks 2nd and LFEQ 8th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
LFEQ vs PTLC
LFEQ −0.02pt a year
0.58%0.60%
PTLC 93.1×the volume
1.09K101K
PTLC +0.9pt
+7.6%+8.5%
LFEQ vs PTLC Performance
+44.0%+50.2%
- LFEQ 0.58%, better
- PTLC 0.60%
- LFEQ $26M
- PTLC $3.15B
- LFEQ +12.5%, better
- PTLC +7.6%
- LFEQ 0.82%
- PTLC 1.01%, better
- LFEQ 2
- PTLC 505
- LFEQ 1.09K sh
- PTLC 101K sh, better
- LFEQ $58.57
- PTLC $57.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LFEQ | PTLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B64 | B64 |
| Tradability | D34 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A71Higher |
| Durability | B62 | A86Higher |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. LFEQ and PTLC are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LFEQB
PTLCA
In short
LFEQ Trend following in an ETF wrapper: LFEQ tracks a Ned Davis Research index that uses daily signals to shift between US large-cap stocks and Treasury bills, trimming equity when the tape weakens. Live since 2017, priced below its peer median.
PTLC Most index funds ride out every drawdown. PTLC tracks an index with an exit ramp: a rules-based trend signal that shifts its large-cap exposure toward 3-month Treasury bills and back, with no manager judgment in the loop.
Stated mandate
LFEQ The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index. The index uses daily signals to vary exposure between U.S. equities and Treasury bills, seeking participation in advances while limiting losses in declines.
PTLC The Fund seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index. That index uses a rules-based trend-following approach that alternates exposure between equities and 3-Month US Treasury bills.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LFEQ vs PTLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LFEQ vs PTLC Cost
Overpaying PTLC vs LFEQ
$364
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LFEQ 0.58%
$11,453
PTLC 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LFEQ | PTLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $1,076 | $35 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $4,116 | $130 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $11,817 | $364 |
- 0.58%LFEQ, cheaper
- 0.60%PTLC
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
LFEQ 5th cheapest of 20 funds
PTLC 6th cheapest of 20 funds
LFEQ vs PTLC Dividends
- LFEQ 0.82%
- PTLC 1.01%, better
- LFEQ $0.49
- PTLC $0.59
- LFEQ $0.49
- PTLC $0.59
- LFEQ Dec 29, 2025
- PTLC Dec 30, 2025
- LFEQ Dec 31, 2025
- PTLC Jan 5, 2026
- LFEQ Annual
- PTLC Annual
Distribution history
LFEQ vs PTLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LFEQ
- PTLC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LFEQ 12.0%PTLC 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LFEQ 1.16, betterPTLC 0.95
- Worst fall
- LFEQ −25.5%PTLC −15.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LFEQ 0.90PTLC 0.87
LFEQ and PTLC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
