Skip to content

LFEQ vs ONOF

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

LFEQBNYSE Arca

Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

ONOFANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ONOF −0.19pt a year

LFEQ0.58%ONOF0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

ONOF 5.2×the volume

LFEQ1.09KONOF5.67K

5Y return · a year

LFEQ +0.7pt

LFEQ+7.6%ONOF+6.9%

LFEQ vs ONOF Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+44.0%LFEQ+39.5%ONOF

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. LFEQ +44.0%. ONOF +39.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LFEQ 0.58%
ONOF 0.39%, better
Fund size
LFEQ $26M
ONOF $136M
1Y total return
LFEQ +12.5%, better
ONOF +9.2%
Yield (12M)
LFEQ 0.82%
ONOF 1.23%, better
Holdings
LFEQ 2
ONOF 506
Avg volume (30D)
LFEQ 1.09K sh
ONOF 5.67K sh, better
NAV per share
LFEQ $58.57
ONOF $39.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LFEQ: Cost 79, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings 36, Durability 62. ONOF: Cost 95, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 72, Durability 56.
Pillar letters and Scores for LFEQ, ONOF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLFEQONOF
Cost30% weightA79A95Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherB62
Tradability15% weightD34B61Higher
Holdings10% weightD36A72Higher
Durability5% weightB62HigherB56

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LFEQ and ONOF are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

ONOF ranks 3rd and LFEQ 8th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AONOFGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4APTMCPacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETFScore 72
  5. Rank 7BPTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 8BLFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETFScore 60
  7. Rank 9BPTINPacer Trendpilot International ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LFEQBVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

ONOFAGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

In short

LFEQ Trend following in an ETF wrapper: LFEQ tracks a Ned Davis Research index that uses daily signals to shift between US large-cap stocks and Treasury bills, trimming equity when the tape weakens. Live since 2017, priced below its peer median.

ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.

Stated mandate

LFEQ The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index. The index uses daily signals to vary exposure between U.S. equities and Treasury bills, seeking participation in advances while limiting losses in declines.

ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.

Why people hold it

  • LFEQ 0.58% a year, against a median near 0.95% for tactical multi-asset funds. Rules-based risk management usually costs more than this.
  • The de-risking is mechanical, not discretionary: daily index signals move exposure between US equities and T-bills. No manager's gut call on when to step aside.
  • Trading since 2017, so the signal has run through live markets and real drawdowns rather than a backtest.
  • ONOF 0.39% a year for a systematic tactical strategy, a fraction of what the typical fund in its tactical-allocation group charges.globalxetfs.com
  • The switch is mechanical. Four technical indicators on the underlying index move it between stocks and Treasuries, so the rulebook is public before you own it.globalxetfs.com
  • The defensive leg is boring on purpose: short-term U.S. Treasuries, not options overlays or shorting.globalxetfs.com
  • Risk-on means roughly 500 U.S. stocks, so the equity exposure is broad-market rather than a concentrated stock-picking bet.globalxetfs.com

Worth knowing

  • LFEQ Trend rules follow price, not forecasts. A sharp V-shaped rebound can get underway while the index is still sitting in Treasury bills.
  • It stays a small, thinly traded fund, which typically means wider bid-ask spreads than a mainstream large-cap index ETF.
  • Cheaper than tactical peers TUGN (0.65%) and PWS (0.60%), though ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run leaner.
  • ONOF Trend rules can whipsaw. In choppy markets the signals may step out after a drop and step back in after a bounce, and the fund's path can diverge sharply from the S&P 500.globalxetfs.com
  • It trades lightly compared with big index funds, so bid-ask spreads tend to be wider.
  • Launched in 2021, so its live record covers a short stretch of market history rather than multiple full cycles.

Full LFEQ profile⁠

Full ONOF profile⁠

LFEQ vs ONOF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LFEQ vs ONOF Cost

Overpaying LFEQ vs ONOF

$3,555

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LFEQ 0.58%

    $11,453

  • ONOF 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LFEQ 0.58%
  • ONOF 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530LFEQ $11,453ONOF $7,898

Year by year

YearLFEQONOFOverpaying
10$1,041$705$336
20$3,986$2,725$1,261
30$11,453$7,898$3,555

Expense ratio

  • 0.58%LFEQ
  • 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds

LFEQ 5th cheapest of 20 funds

LFEQ vs ONOF Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
LFEQ 0.82%
ONOF 1.23%, better
Payout (12M)
LFEQ $0.49
ONOF $0.49
Last payment
LFEQ $0.49
ONOF $0.16
Ex-dividend
LFEQ Dec 29, 2025
ONOF Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
LFEQ Dec 31, 2025
ONOF Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
LFEQ Annual
ONOF Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LFEQAnnual · 9 paymentsAll LFEQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.26; Dec 23, 2019 $0.43; Dec 29, 2020 $0.71; Dec 29, 2021 $0.16; Dec 28, 2022 $0.41; Dec 27, 2023 $0.63; Dec 27, 2024 $0.36; Dec 29, 2025 $0.49. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
ONOFTwice a year · 11 paymentsAll ONOF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 29, 2021 $0.09; Dec 30, 2021 $0.13; Jun 29, 2022 $0.18; Dec 29, 2022 $0.33; Jun 29, 2023 $0.18; Dec 28, 2023 $0.22; Jun 27, 2024 $0.12; Dec 30, 2024 $0.21; Jun 27, 2025 $0.19; Dec 30, 2025 $0.33; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

LFEQ vs ONOF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LFEQ
  • ONOF
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: ONOF −26.2% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LFEQ 12.0%ONOF 12.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LFEQ 1.16, betterONOF 0.82
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LFEQ −25.5%, betterONOF −26.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LFEQ 0.90ONOF 0.96

Popular comparisons

  • LFEQBvsWAMAA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ONOFAvsWAMAA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LFEQBvsPTLCA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ONOFAvsPTLCA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LFEQBvsPTMCA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ONOFAvsPTMCA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.