ONOF ranks 3rd and LFEQ 8th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
LFEQ vs ONOF
ONOF −0.19pt a year
0.58%0.39%
ONOF 5.2×the volume
1.09K5.67K
LFEQ +0.7pt
+7.6%+6.9%
LFEQ vs ONOF Performance
+44.0%+39.5%
- LFEQ 0.58%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- LFEQ $26M
- ONOF $136M
- LFEQ +12.5%, better
- ONOF +9.2%
- LFEQ 0.82%
- ONOF 1.23%, better
- LFEQ 2
- ONOF 506
- LFEQ 1.09K sh
- ONOF 5.67K sh, better
- LFEQ $58.57
- ONOF $39.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LFEQ | ONOF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79 | A95Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | D34 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A72Higher |
| Durability | B62Higher | B56 |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. LFEQ and ONOF are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LFEQB
ONOFA
In short
LFEQ Trend following in an ETF wrapper: LFEQ tracks a Ned Davis Research index that uses daily signals to shift between US large-cap stocks and Treasury bills, trimming equity when the tape weakens. Live since 2017, priced below its peer median.
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
Stated mandate
LFEQ The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index. The index uses daily signals to vary exposure between U.S. equities and Treasury bills, seeking participation in advances while limiting losses in declines.
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LFEQ vs ONOF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LFEQ vs ONOF Cost
Overpaying LFEQ vs ONOF
$3,555
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LFEQ 0.58%
$11,453
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LFEQ | ONOF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $705 | $336 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $2,725 | $1,261 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $7,898 | $3,555 |
- 0.58%LFEQ
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
LFEQ 5th cheapest of 20 funds
LFEQ vs ONOF Dividends
- LFEQ 0.82%
- ONOF 1.23%, better
- LFEQ $0.49
- ONOF $0.49
- LFEQ $0.49
- ONOF $0.16
- LFEQ Dec 29, 2025
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- LFEQ Dec 31, 2025
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- LFEQ Annual
- ONOF Twice a year
Distribution history
LFEQ vs ONOF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LFEQ
- ONOF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LFEQ 12.0%ONOF 12.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- LFEQ 1.16, betterONOF 0.82
- Worst fall
- LFEQ −25.5%, betterONOF −26.2%
- Market sensitivity
- LFEQ 0.90ONOF 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.