Skip to content

LFEQ vs PTMC

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

LFEQBNYSE Arca

Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

PTMCACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

LFEQ −0.02pt a year

LFEQ0.58%PTMC0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTMC 16.1×the volume

LFEQ1.09KPTMC17.5K

5Y return · a year

LFEQ +4.7pt

LFEQ+7.6%PTMC+2.9%

LFEQ vs PTMC Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+44.0%LFEQ+15.2%PTMC

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. LFEQ +44.0%. PTMC +15.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
LFEQ 0.58%, better
PTMC 0.60%
Fund size
LFEQ $26M
PTMC $364M
1Y total return
LFEQ +12.5%
PTMC +15.6%, better
Yield (12M)
LFEQ 0.82%
PTMC 1.63%, better
Holdings
LFEQ 2
PTMC 402
Avg volume (30D)
LFEQ 1.09K sh
PTMC 17.5K sh, better
NAV per share
LFEQ $58.57
PTMC $39.12
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LFEQ: Cost 79, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings 36, Durability 62. PTMC: Cost 71, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 76, Holdings 86, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for LFEQ, PTMC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLFEQPTMC
Cost30% weightA79HigherA71
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherB60
Tradability15% weightD34A76Higher
Holdings10% weightD36A86Higher
Durability5% weightB62A81Higher

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LFEQ and PTMC are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

PTMC ranks 4th and LFEQ 8th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AONOFGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4APTMCPacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETFScore 72
  5. Rank 5AWIMAWisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 71
  6. Rank 7BPTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 8BLFEQVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETFScore 60
  8. Rank 9BPTINPacer Trendpilot International ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LFEQBVanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF

PTMCAPacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

In short

LFEQ Trend following in an ETF wrapper: LFEQ tracks a Ned Davis Research index that uses daily signals to shift between US large-cap stocks and Treasury bills, trimming equity when the tape weakens. Live since 2017, priced below its peer median.

PTMC A mid-cap index fund with a seatbelt built in. PTMC tracks a rules-based trend index that shifts the portfolio between roughly 400 US mid-cap stocks and defensive positioning, with no manager judgment in the loop. Running since 2015.

Stated mandate

LFEQ The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index. The index uses daily signals to vary exposure between U.S. equities and Treasury bills, seeking participation in advances while limiting losses in declines.

PTMC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index.

Why people hold it

  • LFEQ 0.58% a year, against a median near 0.95% for tactical multi-asset funds. Rules-based risk management usually costs more than this.
  • The de-risking is mechanical, not discretionary: daily index signals move exposure between US equities and T-bills. No manager's gut call on when to step aside.
  • Trading since 2017, so the signal has run through live markets and real drawdowns rather than a backtest.
  • PTMC The trend rules do the deciding, not a portfolio manager's gut: the index itself dictates when to hold mid-cap equities and when to shift defensive.paceretfs.com
  • Under the overlay sits a plain, broad basket of roughly 400 US mid caps, not a handful of concentrated picks.
  • Live since 2015, so the signal has run through real market drawdowns and recoveries rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • LFEQ Trend rules follow price, not forecasts. A sharp V-shaped rebound can get underway while the index is still sitting in Treasury bills.
  • It stays a small, thinly traded fund, which typically means wider bid-ask spreads than a mainstream large-cap index ETF.
  • Cheaper than tactical peers TUGN (0.65%) and PWS (0.60%), though ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run leaner.
  • PTMC The 0.60% fee buys the rules, not more stocks. Plain index wrappers in the same peer group, like VXF at 0.05%, simply hold the market and skip the overlay.
  • Trend systems move on sustained direction, so a sharp drop and fast snapback can whipsaw the signal in both directions.paceretfs.com
  • It trades lightly next to vanilla mid-cap index funds, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads at the moment of the trade.

Full LFEQ profile⁠

Full PTMC profile⁠

LFEQ vs PTMC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LFEQ vs PTMC Cost

Overpaying PTMC vs LFEQ

$364

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LFEQ 0.58%

    $11,453

  • PTMC 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LFEQ 0.58%
  • PTMC 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PTMC $11,817LFEQ $11,453

Year by year

YearLFEQPTMCOverpaying
10$1,041$1,076$35
20$3,986$4,116$130
30$11,453$11,817$364

Expense ratio

  • 0.58%LFEQ, cheaper
  • 0.60%PTMC
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

LFEQ 5th cheapest of 20 funds

PTMC 6th cheapest of 20 funds

LFEQ vs PTMC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
LFEQ 0.82%
PTMC 1.63%, better
Payout (12M)
LFEQ $0.49
PTMC $0.66
Last payment
LFEQ $0.49
PTMC $0.66
Ex-dividend
LFEQ Dec 29, 2025
PTMC Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
LFEQ Dec 31, 2025
PTMC Jan 5, 2026
Frequency
LFEQ Annual
PTMC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

LFEQAnnual · 9 paymentsAll LFEQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.26; Dec 23, 2019 $0.43; Dec 29, 2020 $0.71; Dec 29, 2021 $0.16; Dec 28, 2022 $0.41; Dec 27, 2023 $0.63; Dec 27, 2024 $0.36; Dec 29, 2025 $0.49. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
PTMCAnnual · 9 paymentsAll PTMC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.21; Dec 24, 2018 $0.28; Dec 24, 2019 $0.43; Dec 21, 2020 $0.17; Dec 23, 2021 $0.04; Dec 22, 2022 $0.26; Dec 27, 2023 $0.63; Dec 27, 2024 $0.32; Dec 30, 2025 $0.66. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

LFEQ vs PTMC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LFEQ
  • PTMC
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: LFEQ −25.5% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LFEQ 12.0%, betterPTMC 14.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LFEQ 1.16, betterPTMC 0.48
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LFEQ −25.5%PTMC −16.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LFEQ 0.90PTMC 0.77

Popular comparisons

  • LFEQBvsWAMAA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTMCAvsWAMAA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LFEQBvsPTLCA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTMCAvsPTLCA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LFEQBvsONOFA

    VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTMCAvsONOFA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.