PTMC ranks 4th and LFEQ 8th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
LFEQ vs PTMC
LFEQ −0.02pt a year
0.58%0.60%
PTMC 16.1×the volume
1.09K17.5K
LFEQ +4.7pt
+7.6%+2.9%
LFEQ vs PTMC Performance
+44.0%+15.2%
- LFEQ 0.58%, better
- PTMC 0.60%
- LFEQ $26M
- PTMC $364M
- LFEQ +12.5%
- PTMC +15.6%, better
- LFEQ 0.82%
- PTMC 1.63%, better
- LFEQ 2
- PTMC 402
- LFEQ 1.09K sh
- PTMC 17.5K sh, better
- LFEQ $58.57
- PTMC $39.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LFEQ | PTMC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79Higher | A71 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | D34 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A86Higher |
| Durability | B62 | A81Higher |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. LFEQ and PTMC are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LFEQB
PTMCA
In short
LFEQ Trend following in an ETF wrapper: LFEQ tracks a Ned Davis Research index that uses daily signals to shift between US large-cap stocks and Treasury bills, trimming equity when the tape weakens. Live since 2017, priced below its peer median.
PTMC A mid-cap index fund with a seatbelt built in. PTMC tracks a rules-based trend index that shifts the portfolio between roughly 400 US mid-cap stocks and defensive positioning, with no manager judgment in the loop. Running since 2015.
Stated mandate
LFEQ The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index. The index uses daily signals to vary exposure between U.S. equities and Treasury bills, seeking participation in advances while limiting losses in declines.
PTMC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LFEQ vs PTMC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LFEQ vs PTMC Cost
Overpaying PTMC vs LFEQ
$364
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LFEQ 0.58%
$11,453
PTMC 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LFEQ | PTMC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $1,076 | $35 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $4,116 | $130 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $11,817 | $364 |
- 0.58%LFEQ, cheaper
- 0.60%PTMC
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
LFEQ 5th cheapest of 20 funds
PTMC 6th cheapest of 20 funds
LFEQ vs PTMC Dividends
- LFEQ 0.82%
- PTMC 1.63%, better
- LFEQ $0.49
- PTMC $0.66
- LFEQ $0.49
- PTMC $0.66
- LFEQ Dec 29, 2025
- PTMC Dec 30, 2025
- LFEQ Dec 31, 2025
- PTMC Jan 5, 2026
- LFEQ Annual
- PTMC Annual
Distribution history
LFEQ vs PTMC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LFEQ
- PTMC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LFEQ 12.0%, betterPTMC 14.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- LFEQ 1.16, betterPTMC 0.48
- Worst fall
- LFEQ −25.5%PTMC −16.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LFEQ 0.90PTMC 0.77
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.