LMUB ranks 2nd and TAFL 5th of 5 funds in the Long-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
LMUB vs TAFL
LMUB −0.19pt a year
0.09%0.28%
LMUB 26.8×the volume
547K20.4K
LMUB vs TAFL Performance
−1.1%−0.7%
- LMUB 0.09%, better
- TAFL 0.28%
- LMUB $1.83B
- TAFL $59M
- LMUB −1.1%
- TAFL −0.7%, better
- LMUB 4.03%
- TAFL 4.27%, better
- LMUB 1086
- TAFL 140
- LMUB 547K sh, better
- TAFL 20.4K sh
- LMUB $48.19
- TAFL $24.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LMUB | TAFL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | F23 |
| Mission | B59Higher | B57 |
| Risk | D38 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A70Higher | D37 |
Rank among Long-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. LMUB and TAFL are both graded against the same 5 Long-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LMUBB
TAFLC
In short
LMUB Most muni funds hand you the whole maturity curve. LMUB takes only the long end: investment-grade national municipal bonds maturing in 12 years or more, indexed, for 0.09% a year.
TAFL Most muni ETFs hug an index. TAFL is the active take on the long end of the tax-exempt curve, run by AB's municipal desk for after-tax income, at 0.28% a year.
Stated mandate
LMUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds with maturities of at least 12 years.
TAFL The Fund seeks enhanced income and attractive risk-adjusted after-tax returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LMUB vs TAFL Holdings
How LMUB and TAFL differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country98.7%
Sector
No Sector split for LMUB and TAFL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in LMUBMore in TAFL | LMUB | TAFL |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | LMUB +1.3 points | 100.0% | 98.7% |
| Puerto Rico | TAFL +1.3 points | 0.0% | 1.3% |
Concentration
- LMUB7.3%
- TAFL21.8%
- LMUB1,052
- TAFL138
Asset class
- LMUB
- Fixed Income
- TAFL
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. LMUB holds 1,052 securities, TAFL 138.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LMUB vs TAFL Cost
Overpaying TAFL vs LMUB
$3,857
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LMUB 0.09%
$1,898
TAFL 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LMUB | TAFL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $509 | $344 |
| 20 | $646 | $1,976 | $1,330 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $5,755 | $3,857 |
- 0.09%LMUB, cheaper
- 0.28%TAFL
- Middle half of Long-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.24%
LMUB cheapest of 5 funds
TAFL 5th cheapest of 5 funds
LMUB vs TAFL Dividends
- LMUB 4.03%
- TAFL 4.27%, better
- LMUB $1.94
- TAFL $1.03
- LMUB $0.19
- TAFL $0.09
- LMUB Oct 1, 2026
- TAFL Oct 1, 2026
- LMUB Oct 6, 2026
- TAFL Oct 6, 2026
- LMUB Monthly
- TAFL Monthly
Distribution history
LMUB vs TAFL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LMUB 7.6%TAFL 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- LMUB −0.23TAFL −0.43
- Worst fall
- LMUB −9.5%TAFL −7.8%
- Market sensitivity
- LMUB 0.17TAFL 0.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.24%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.24%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.