LMUB ranks 2nd and TMNL 4th of 5 funds in the Long-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
LMUB vs TMNL
LMUB −0.17pt a year
0.09%0.26%
LMUB 593.5×the volume
547K922
LMUB vs TMNL Performance
−1.4%+0.9%
- LMUB 0.09%, better
- TMNL 0.26%
- LMUB $1.83B
- TMNL $24M
- LMUB −1.1%
- TMNL
- LMUB 4.03%
- TMNL
- LMUB 1086
- TMNL 148
- LMUB 547K sh, better
- TMNL 922 sh
- LMUB $48.19
- TMNL $48.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LMUB | TMNL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | D39 |
| Mission | B59 | B63Higher |
| Risk | D38 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | B64Higher | C48 |
| Durability | A70Higher | F17 |
Rank among Long-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. LMUB and TMNL are both graded against the same 5 Long-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LMUBB
TMNLC
In short
LMUB Most muni funds hand you the whole maturity curve. LMUB takes only the long end: investment-grade national municipal bonds maturing in 12 years or more, indexed, for 0.09% a year.
TMNL T. Rowe Price's muni desk goes long: an active fund that parks past the ten-year mark on the muni curve, hunting federally tax-free income where the index giants just own the whole market.
Stated mandate
LMUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds with maturities of at least 12 years.
TMNL The fund seeks high current income that is exempt from federal income taxes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LMUB vs TMNL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LMUB vs TMNL Cost
Overpaying TMNL vs LMUB
$3,460
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LMUB 0.09%
$1,898
TMNL 0.26%
$5,358
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LMUB | TMNL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $473 | $308 |
| 20 | $646 | $1,838 | $1,192 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $5,358 | $3,460 |
- 0.09%LMUB, cheaper
- 0.26%TMNL
- Middle half of Long-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.24%
LMUB cheapest of 5 funds
TMNL 4th cheapest of 5 funds
LMUB vs TMNL Dividends
- LMUB 4.03%
- TMNL
- LMUB $1.94
- TMNL
- LMUB $0.19
- TMNL $0.17
- LMUB Oct 1, 2026
- TMNL Oct 27, 2026
- LMUB Oct 6, 2026
- TMNL Oct 29, 2026
- LMUB Monthly
- TMNL Monthly
Distribution history
LMUB vs TMNL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LMUB 7.6%TMNL
- Return per unit of risk
- LMUB −0.23TMNL
- Worst fall
- LMUB −9.5%TMNL
- Market sensitivity
- LMUB 0.17TMNL 0.17Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.24%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.24%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.