SEIX ranks 2nd and LONZ 4th of 11 funds in the Bank Loan Category.
LONZ vs SEIX
SEIX −0.04pt a year
0.61%0.57%
SEIX 1.8×the volume
66.1K121K
LONZ +0.5pt
+7.3%+6.8%
LONZ vs SEIX Performance
+4.4%+5.0%
- LONZ 0.61%
- SEIX 0.57%, better
- LONZ $640M
- SEIX $305M
- LONZ +4.4%
- SEIX +5.0%, better
- LONZ 8.70%, better
- SEIX 6.98%
- LONZ 352
- SEIX 268
- LONZ 66.1K sh
- SEIX 121K sh, better
- LONZ $48.82
- SEIX $23.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LONZ | SEIX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44 | B65Higher |
| Mission | A72Higher | D35 |
| Risk | B58 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | F19 | A83Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | D37 |
Rank among Bank Loan funds
Same Category. LONZ and SEIX are both graded against the same 11 Bank Loan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LONZC
SEIXB
In short
LONZ PIMCO's credit desk in an ETF wrapper: an actively run book of senior secured floating-rate loans that pays monthly. Priced right at the middle of a small, specialized peer group, with a manager pick behind every position instead of an index.
SEIX Most funds in this corner of the bond market buy fixed-rate high-yield bonds and follow an index. SEIX does neither: an actively picked book of senior loans built around one job, a high level of current income, paid out monthly.
Stated mandate
LONZ The Fund primarily seeks floating-rate income by investing at least 80% of assets in a diversified portfolio of senior secured loans, including related derivatives.
SEIX The Fund seeks to provide a high level of current income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LONZ vs SEIX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LONZ vs SEIX Cost
Overpaying LONZ vs SEIX
$727
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LONZ 0.61%
$11,998
SEIX 0.57%
$11,271
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LONZ | SEIX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,093 | $1,023 | $70 |
| 20 | $4,181 | $3,921 | $260 |
| 30 | $11,998 | $11,271 | $727 |
- 0.61%LONZ
- 0.57%SEIX, cheaper
- Middle half of Bank Loan funds
- Median 0.61%
SEIX 4th cheapest of 11 funds
LONZ 6th cheapest of 11 funds
LONZ vs SEIX Dividends
- LONZ 8.70%, better
- SEIX 6.98%
- LONZ $4.24
- SEIX $1.60
- LONZ $0.24
- SEIX $0.12
- LONZ Oct 1, 2026
- SEIX Oct 20, 2026
- LONZ Oct 5, 2026
- SEIX Oct 27, 2026
- LONZ Monthly
- SEIX Monthly
Distribution history
LONZ vs SEIX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LONZ 2.3%SEIX 1.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LONZ 1.21, betterSEIX 1.20
- Worst fall
- LONZ −4.2%SEIX −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- LONZ 0.07SEIX 0.05
Popular comparisons
- 0.61% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.57% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.