FTSL ranks 4th and LONZ 4th of 11 funds in the Bank Loan Category.
FTSL vs LONZ
LONZ −0.09pt a year
0.70%0.61%
FTSL 4.4×the volume
292K66.1K
LONZ +0.9pt
+6.4%+7.3%
FTSL vs LONZ Performance
+3.3%+4.4%
- FTSL 0.70%
- LONZ 0.61%, better
- FTSL $2.49B
- LONZ $640M
- FTSL +3.3%
- LONZ +4.4%, better
- FTSL 6.28%
- LONZ 8.70%, better
- FTSL 377
- LONZ 352
- FTSL 292K sh, better
- LONZ 66.1K sh
- FTSL $44.49
- LONZ $48.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTSL | LONZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | C44Higher |
| Mission | B62 | A72Higher |
| Risk | C52 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | A90Higher | F19 |
| Durability | A85Higher | B56 |
Rank among Bank Loan funds
Same Category. FTSL and LONZ are both graded against the same 11 Bank Loan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTSLC
LONZC
In short
FTSL Most funds in the high-yield aisle own fixed-coupon junk bonds. FTSL owns first-lien senior bank loans whose coupons float with short-term rates, chosen by a live credit team instead of an index rulebook, with income paid monthly.
LONZ PIMCO's credit desk in an ETF wrapper: an actively run book of senior secured floating-rate loans that pays monthly. Priced right at the middle of a small, specialized peer group, with a manager pick behind every position instead of an index.
Stated mandate
FTSL The fund seeks high current income and secondarily aims to preserve capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in first-lien senior floating-rate bank loans, primarily to North American businesses.
LONZ The Fund primarily seeks floating-rate income by investing at least 80% of assets in a diversified portfolio of senior secured loans, including related derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTSL vs LONZ Holdings
How FTSL and LONZ differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country94.7%
Sector
No Sector split for FTSL and LONZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FTSLMore in LONZ | FTSL | LONZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | LONZ +4.0 points | 88.1% | 92.1% |
| Canada | FTSL +1.3 points | 3.3% | 2.0% |
| United Kingdom | FTSL +0.9 points | 1.4% | 0.5% |
| Japan | FTSL +0.8 points | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Luxembourg | LONZ +0.7 points | 1.5% | 2.2% |
| France | FTSL +0.7 points | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Bermuda | FTSL +0.6 points | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (8) | FTSL +0.4 points | 3.6% | 3.2% |
Concentration
- FTSL13.0%
- LONZ28.7%
- FTSL376
- LONZ349
Asset class
- FTSL
- Fixed Income
- LONZ
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. FTSL holds 376 securities, LONZ 349.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTSL vs LONZ Cost
Overpaying FTSL vs LONZ
$1,608
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTSL 0.70%
$13,606
LONZ 0.61%
$11,998
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTSL | LONZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,093 | $157 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $4,181 | $579 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $11,998 | $1,608 |
- 0.70%FTSL
- 0.61%LONZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Bank Loan funds
- Median 0.61%
LONZ 6th cheapest of 11 funds
FTSL 9th cheapest of 11 funds
FTSL vs LONZ Dividends
- FTSL 6.28%
- LONZ 8.70%, better
- FTSL $2.80
- LONZ $4.24
- FTSL $0.23
- LONZ $0.24
- FTSL Oct 21, 2026
- LONZ Oct 1, 2026
- FTSL Oct 30, 2026
- LONZ Oct 5, 2026
- FTSL Monthly
- LONZ Monthly
Distribution history
FTSL vs LONZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTSL 2.0%, betterLONZ 2.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTSL 0.88LONZ 1.21, better
- Worst fall
- FTSL −7.0%LONZ −4.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FTSL 0.06LONZ 0.07
FTSL and LONZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.61% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
