LOWV ranks 4th and SAWG 8th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.
LOWV vs SAWG
LOWV −0.10pt a year
0.39%0.49%
LOWV 7.0×the volume
7.72K1.1K
LOWV vs SAWG Performance
+8.9%+8.3%
- LOWV 0.39%, better
- SAWG 0.49%
- LOWV $209M
- SAWG $3M
- LOWV +8.9%, better
- SAWG +8.3%
- LOWV 0.84%, better
- SAWG 0.25%
- LOWV 73
- SAWG 43
- LOWV 7.72K sh, better
- SAWG 1.1K sh
- LOWV $84.51
- SAWG $24.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LOWV | SAWG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C45Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A71Higher | D30 |
| Holdings | B55Higher | D37 |
| Durability | B62Higher | F18 |
Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds
Same Category. LOWV and SAWG are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LOWVB
SAWGD
In short
LOWV A stock picker's answer to low volatility. AB runs about 70 US large caps through its own quality, profitability and value screen instead of tracking a published low-vol index, at 0.39% a year.
SAWG The name says growth; the mandate says brakes. An active fund aiming for market upside while emphasizing downside protection and lower volatility, which lands it among low-vol defensives rather than pure growth funds.
Stated mandate
LOWV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio primarily invested in U.S. large-cap equities, with an emphasis on lower volatility than the broader equity market.
SAWG The Fund seeks risk-adjusted returns with participation in market upside, while emphasizing downside protection and lower volatility.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LOWV vs SAWG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LOWV vs SAWG Cost
Overpaying SAWG vs LOWV
$1,894
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LOWV 0.39%
$7,898
SAWG 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LOWV | SAWG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $883 | $178 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,394 | $669 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,792 | $1,894 |
- 0.39%LOWV, cheaper
- 0.49%SAWG
- Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
- Median 0.47%
LOWV 4th cheapest of 10 funds
SAWG 6th cheapest of 10 funds
LOWV vs SAWG Dividends
- LOWV 0.84%, better
- SAWG 0.25%
- LOWV $0.71
- SAWG $0.06
- LOWV $0.18
- SAWG $0.06
- LOWV Sep 18, 2026
- SAWG Dec 31, 2025
- LOWV Sep 21, 2026
- SAWG Jan 5, 2026
- LOWV Quarterly
- SAWG Irregular
Distribution history
LOWV vs SAWG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LOWV 9.9%SAWG 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- LOWV 1.24SAWG 0.66
- Worst fall
- LOWV −13.9%SAWG −18.7%
- Market sensitivity
- LOWV 0.73SAWG 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.