Skip to content

SAWG vs TOAK

AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF

SAWGDNYSE Arca

Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

TOAKANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TOAK −0.23pt a year

SAWG0.49%TOAK0.26%

Avg volume · 30D

TOAK 9.9×the volume

SAWG1.1KTOAK10.9K

SAWG vs TOAK Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.3%SAWG+3.6%TOAK

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. SAWG +8.3%. TOAK +3.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SAWG 0.49%
TOAK 0.26%, better
Fund size
SAWG $3M
TOAK $101M
1Y total return
SAWG +8.3%, better
TOAK +3.6%
Yield (12M)
SAWG 0.25%
TOAK No data
Holdings
SAWG 43
TOAK 3
Avg volume (30D)
SAWG 1.1K sh
TOAK 10.9K sh, better
NAV per share
SAWG $24.31
TOAK $29.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SAWG: Cost 47, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings 37, Durability 18. TOAK: Cost 86, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for SAWG, TOAK, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSAWGTOAK
Cost30% weightC47A86Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF24B61Higher
Tradability15% weightD30B60Higher
Holdings10% weightD37Not scored
Durability5% weightF18C47Higher

Rank among US Active Low Volatility funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SAWG and TOAK are both graded against the same 10 US Active Low Volatility funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Low Volatility⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

TOAK ranks 3rd and SAWG 8th of 10 funds in the US Active Low Volatility Category.

  1. Rank 1ASELVSEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2ACGCVCapital Group Conservative Equity ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3ATOAKTwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BLOWVAB US Low Volatility Equity ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 7CSFTYHorizon Managed Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 8DSAWGAAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETFScore 35
  7. Rank 9DCCORCore Alternative ETFScore 27
  8. HAWGNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SAWGDAAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF

TOAKATwin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF

In short

SAWG The name says growth; the mandate says brakes. An active fund aiming for market upside while emphasizing downside protection and lower volatility, which lands it among low-vol defensives rather than pure growth funds.

TOAK Shelved with low-volatility equity funds, TOAK owns no stocks. It runs a paired options book with a zero-to-one-year horizon, each position's maximum loss limited to the premium paid, at 0.26% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

Stated mandate

SAWG The Fund seeks risk-adjusted returns with participation in market upside, while emphasizing downside protection and lower volatility.

TOAK The Fund seeks capital appreciation with low price volatility, which the Adviser describes as stable returns. It pursues this through defined-risk options intended to generate an absolute return over a short, zero-to-one-year duration.

Why people hold it

  • SAWG The contract is written down: its own filing commits to participation in market upside while emphasizing downside protection and lower volatility.
  • Simple plumbing. A US large-cap stock portfolio with no leverage, no options overlay, and no derivative machinery to decode.
  • Runs without a declared index, so managers can lean defensive when they choose instead of holding whatever a rulebook prints.
  • TOAK Defined risk is written into the strategy: the most any single option position can lose in an expiry period is the premium paid, and the fund states it uses no leverage and sells no naked options.sec.gov
  • 0.26% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (0.46% gross) sits below the category median and under peers such as LOWV at 0.39% and SIXL at 0.46%.
  • Long calls are always paired with long puts (and call spreads with put spreads), legs that tend to move against each other. That pairing is the stated engine behind the low-volatility half of the mandate.sec.gov
  • Different wiring from its shelf-mates: an absolute-return options sleeve on broad US equity exposure rather than a screened basket of defensive stocks, and it stands in the upper half of that peer group.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • SAWG At 0.49%, it costs more than several low-vol rivals: SELV charges 0.15% and CGCV 0.33% for a similar defensive job.
  • Small and thinly traded, so bid-ask spreads can widen and large orders may move the price more than in a heavily traded fund.
  • Launched in 2024, so the downside-protection mandate has not yet faced a full market cycle. Distributions come annually or semiannually, not monthly.
  • TOAK Launched in 2024, so the track record is short and covers only one market stretch. It is also a smaller fund than most names on this shelf.
  • Thinly traded for its category, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the big liquid names. Limit orders matter more here.
  • No income stream: the fund has not been paying distributions, so whatever the options book produces shows up in share price, not as yield.

Full SAWG profile⁠

Full TOAK profile⁠

SAWG vs TOAK Holdings

How SAWG and TOAK differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SAWG and 0.0% of TOAK.

Level by level

  • Asset classEquity, Alternatives0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for TOAK.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for TOAK.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SAWG48.0%
  • TOAK100.0%

Securities held

  • SAWG43
  • TOAK2

Asset class

SAWG
Equity
TOAK
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in SAWG43
  • In both0
  • Only in TOAK2

Only in SAWG

43 securities, 100% of SAWG by weight

  • Apple Inc7.87%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.18%
  • Alphabet Inc6.28%

Only in TOAK

2 securities, 99.9% of TOAK by weight

  • Qqq 01/15/2027 20.01 C67.64%
  • Qqq 01/15/2027 1020.01 P32.28%

Weight gaps

SAWG and TOAK share no securities.

All 44 SAWG holdings⁠All TOAK holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SAWG vs TOAK Cost

Overpaying SAWG vs TOAK

$4,434

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SAWG 0.49%

    $9,792

  • TOAK 0.26%

    $5,358

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SAWG 0.49%
  • TOAK 0.26%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530SAWG $9,792TOAK $5,358

Year by year

YearSAWGTOAKOverpaying
10$883$473$410
20$3,394$1,838$1,556
30$9,792$5,358$4,434

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%SAWG
  • 0.26%TOAK, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Low Volatility funds
  • Median 0.47%

TOAK 2nd cheapest of 10 funds

SAWG 6th cheapest of 10 funds

SAWG vs TOAK Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
SAWG 0.25%
TOAK No data
Payout (12M)
SAWG $0.06
TOAK None
Last payment
SAWG $0.06
TOAK No data
Ex-dividend
SAWG Dec 31, 2025
TOAK No data
Paid on
SAWG Jan 5, 2026
TOAK No data
Frequency
SAWG Irregular
TOAK No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

SAWGIrregular · 2 paymentsAll SAWG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 31, 2024 $0.03; Dec 31, 2025 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD
TOAKAll TOAK payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SAWG vs TOAK Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SAWG 11.8%since Aug 2024TOAK 0.3%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SAWG 0.66since Aug 2024TOAK −0.72since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SAWG −18.7%since Jul 2024TOAK −1.8%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SAWG 0.95TOAK 0.0003

SAWG and TOAK in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SAWGDvsSELVA

    AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsSELVA

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SAWGDvsCGCVA

    AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF · Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsCGCVA

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SAWGDvsLOWVB

    AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF · AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TOAKAvsLOWVB

    Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF · AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.